Tokyohands
Well-known member
Can't help but think that had that been in most places in England he'd have (rightly) got a proper pasting. Probably just from the women who were there.
Nah, everyone would be too busy filming him.
Can't help but think that had that been in most places in England he'd have (rightly) got a proper pasting. Probably just from the women who were there.
Nah, everyone would be too busy filming him.
The thing is, if you (he) did that, you could be (successfully) prosecuted.
I knnow, It’s not reality though is it? Eg It’s the law in the first place not to commit crime but people still do sadlyThat's not the case in France though. If you see someone being assaulted then bystanders have a legal duty to intervene or can nebe charged with non-assistance à personne en danger. I imagine a magistrate may be looking at this to see whether anyone could have intervened or whether it happened too quickly.
I was thinking of England, as that's where we live, and if we saw someone fit a woman, we'd likely be at home in England. Maybe you'd be ok with it in France, but strictly speaking those people weren't in a position to stop an attack, as the attack had ended and the guy was walking away.That, as I pointed out above, is just not true. In France, you're more likely to be prosecuted for not doing anything
I was thinking of England, as that's where we live, and if we saw someone fit a woman, we'd likely be at home in England. Maybe you'd be ok with it in France, but strictly speaking those people weren't in a position to stop an attack, as the attack had ended and the guy was walking away.
That's not the case in France though. If you see someone being assaulted then bystanders have a legal duty to intervene or can nebe charged with non-assistance à personne en danger. I imagine a magistrate may be looking at this to see whether anyone could have intervened or whether it happened too quickly.
That, as I pointed out above, is just not true. In France, you're more likely to be prosecuted for not doing anything
We may live in England but the attack happened in France and English law doesn't apply thereI was thinking of England, as that's where we live
Does that apply after the attacker is already walking away? There's a difference between not intervening to help someone and decking someone who is walking away.
We may live in England but the attack happened in France and English law doesn't apply there
I've absolutely no idea, I'm not a French lawyer. But there is a difference in French law and English law here given the obligation to help. My guess here is that no-one would be expected to intervene but if someone thought to give the bloke a bit of a slap, the authorities would be happy to turn a blind eye.
But I was replying to Simster who was saying what he thinks he'd do in a similar situation. A similar situation would be for it to happen here, and if on holiday I don't suppose he'd have time to quickly look up the law in the country he's in to determine whether or not he's within his rights to punch the guy.We may live in England but the attack happened in France and English law doesn't apply there
I agree if it was just a slap, but if you punched him and he fell to the floor and injured his head, you could be in a spot of bother.My guess here is that no-one would be expected to intervene but if someone thought to give the bloke a bit of a slap, the authorities would be happy to turn a blind eye.
She'd have got her gun out, he'd have taken it off her and killed her, and then he'd have killed the guy with the chair and a few others for good measure. We'd then be discussing whether lives could have been saved if the guy with a chair had a gun instead of a chair.I'm surprised nobody has pointed out 'it wouldn't have happened if she had a gun'
She'd have got her gun out, he'd have taken it off her and killed her, and then he'd have killed the guy with the chair and a few others for good measure. We'd then be discussing whether lives could have been saved if the guy with a chair had a gun instead of a chair.
But they didn't, which is why I said 'We'd then be discussing whether lives could have been saved if the guy with a chair had a gun instead of a chair.'Not if the guy with the chair had a gun, and the waiter as well.
Not if the guy with the chair had a gun, and the waiter as well.