schmunk
"Members"
What I don't understand: if he wanted to kill or maim lots of people with his car, why on Earth did he choose a Fiesta?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Incident London
- Thread starter doogie004
- Start date
sydney
tinky ****in winky
just a thought , should this chap prove to be a recent migrant from libya , syria or the like then targeting the H.O.P for this attack will get him instant recognition from his brothers, probable hero status and a long stretch at her majesty's pleasure with 3 meals a day , a warm dry cell , a pillow and a blanket , playstation , snooker , indoor football , a wash every morning and if he's lucky he will go to one of the prisons where he has his own dedicated prayer room and study room .......it's a virtual nirvana for some of these people , just a thought .
luppers
New member
Just a thought, may he be mentally ill. Wait for rude comments
sydney
tinky ****in winky
100% no doubt he is suffering some sort of delusion .
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,287
If he’s an extremist he certainly is
Hmmm, I'm not sure his actions were extreme.
Perhaps he's a mildist.
AmexRuislip
Trainee Spy 🕵️♂️
So you're saying that if he chose, say a stretched limousine, it'll be the perfect vehicle of choice?
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
The prick ****ed the traffic right up yesterday very inconsiderate.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
So he was born in Sudan and now has British citizenship. Why the hell are we handing out British citizenship like confetti? What did this guy ever do to qualify for, or deserve British citizenship? Personally I think there should be a complete review of our citizenship rules. Who we are giving it to and why?
Thank you. The solution to Islamic terrorism at a stroke. I'll forward your message to Mrs May. She'll certainly have to give her head a wobble after reading that!
Bladders
Twats everywhere
Can you add a P.S to your letter too....
You can ask her why the Royal Navy delivered the Manchester bomber to our shores at the same time.
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
youre spot on for once,
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
he didnt say it was a solution to the problem , for once hes spot on .
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
The usual "refugees welcome" clowns on NSC are conspicuous by their absence .
- Apr 5, 2014
- 23,526
Apparently making migration easier for folks from Islamic countries would reduce the possibility of terror attacks .
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ce-isis-uses-route-human-rights-a7377961.html
UN report finds no evidence migration causes terror attacks and warns anti-refugee laws could worsen risk
A United Nations investigator has warned that moves to crackdown on migration may worsen the risk of more attacks in Europe while breaching refugees’ fundamental rights.
Ben Emmerson, the Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights, found “little evidence” that Isis and other terror groups use refugee flows or that asylum seekers are prone to radicalisation.
Delivering a report to the UN General Assembly in New York, he said: “While there is no evidence that migration leads to increased terrorist activity, migration policies that are restrictive or that violate human rights may in fact create conditions conducive to terrorism.
“Overly-restrictive migration policies introduced because of terrorism concerns are not justified and may in fact be damaging to state security.”
Because he was a British citizen, apparently.
A government spokesman said: “During the deteriorating security situation in Libya in 2014, Border Force officials were deployed to assist with the evacuation of British nationals and their dependants.”
Abedi was being monitored by security services when he travelled to Libya, but his case was closed a month before his rescue.
The Anderson review into the Manchester attack found that the decision to close Abedi’s case as a “subject of interest” was sound, based on the information available to security services at the time.
A government source told the Daily Mail: “For this man to commit such an atrocity on UK soil after we rescued him from Libya was an act of utter betrayal.”
Hmmmm....betrayed by an ungrateful sod. Solutions? We could stop Islamic terrorism in the UK by forcibly expelling all Muslims. If that is 'a bit unfair' then we could set up local courts of inquisition, where we round up all Muslims, intern them in camps, then interview them one by one, using tricky inqusitorial qustions and techniques, like the Spanish used to do to weed out non-Catholics. Those who pass the tests can be allowed to live under monitored conditions.
Alternatively....we could do what we do now. The secret services have prevented dozens of incidents, planned by a tiny minority of not only the 'regular' Muslims, most of whom are unremarkable immigrants or their descendents, but the higher risk type 'refugee from Libya, Sudan' etc. How do they do that? I don't know - its SECRET.
Other things we could do - take back state control over schools; allowing state support for 'religious' schools was why I resigned from the labour party. Make schools, including 'public' schools (which includes 'private' religious schools) follow the national curriculum, and teach about equality (of race, religion, gender and sexuality). Introduce common citizenship tests for 15 and 18 year olds (with a sting in the tail - rewards for those who pass and punishments such as curfew for those who fail). Introduce extraordinary citizenship tests for immigrants aged 18 to 40 who have 'escaped' the tests at 15 and 18 (this is a bit harsh but 'needs must'). Ban single sex religious worship (see, I can be quite right wing when I put my mind to it).
I can see everyone being implanted with a trackable chip at some point. Personally I would have no problem with that. A bloke at GCHQ is welcome to track my movements. There again, I'm not nipping round for a legover with a neighbour so this may not be up everyone's street.
Bottom line is we can have as much rules and security as we are willing to vote for and pay for (taxes). My feeling is the majority of this country are content with the current balance, albeit dismayed and angry when it doesn't work out how we want it to work out. The partiess that have a militant anti-immigrant anti-muslim ethos are incoherent, obviously racist and obviously clueless, hence their total lack of traction as likely parties of government. Also, no party (including liberal, labour and tory) has a fully coherent, balanced, fair, comprehenive policy that 'upps the ante' (as I have suggested). Clearly none of them feel the ante needs to be upped (as per see above). Perhaps we need some sort of commission on this.....but it will be slow to conclude and the government will do what it usually does (nothing).
We can debate this all again 'next time' but the issues will all be the same....
For decades investigators 'found little evidence' that cigarette smoking causes cancer.
