Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

Rohan Ince to Swindon etc...







Thunder Bolt

Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Aug 18, 2009
65,439
Beside the seaside, beside the sea
cooliobhafc said:
If you read the court case you will read stated evidence of blood splatters on Ince's jacket, a jacket that matched the description of several witnesses. the splatters were said to have been more than a million to 1 shot that they weren't connected with the assault.
Click to expand...

You will also note, having read the case, that it was a unanimous not guilty verdict. All 12 jurors said not guitly. Not one of them was convinced in the slightest of his guilt. He said all along it was a case of mistaken identity and the prosecution and police failed to prove he was the culprit.
No fingerprints, no cctv and the forensics helped Ince, not the police.
 










C

cooliobhafc

New member
Mar 15, 2012
231
Brighton
Exile said:
I have. The forensic EXPERT agreed that the small traces of blood on Ince's jacket were explainable by his contact with the injured man AFTER his arrest.
Click to expand...

Thanks Exile, I haven't seen the acquittal, just the case put forward, i wasnt basing my statement on any suggestion that Ince was guilty, completely the opposite.

As usual people are so quick to jump down other peoples throats.
 




H

halbpro

Well-known member
Jan 25, 2012
2,862
Brighton
Thunder Bolt said:
You will also note, having read the case, that it was a unanimous not guilty verdict. All 12 jurors said not guitly. Not one of them was convinced in the slightest of his guilt. He said all along it was a case of mistaken identity and the prosecution and police failed to prove he was the culprit.
No fingerprints, no cctv and the forensics helped Ince, not the police.
Click to expand...

And it seems that they came to that conclusion very quickly too, believe it was less than two hours? That would seem to suggest they didn't have a lot of doubt about the verdict either.
 




e77

e77

Well-known member
May 23, 2004
7,268
Worthing
Would have thought the first thing the Police would have done would be secure CCTV footage.
 


clapham_gull

clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,306
BensGrandad said:
That doesnt follow as I have been hit over the head with a bottle a couple of times once with a coke bottle and once a cider bottle neither, although bringing about some blood, did not bring it gushing as per to players clashing heads/.
Click to expand...
Have you considered a career in forensics ?

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
 










B

Bad Ash

Unregistered User
Jul 18, 2003
1,900
Housewares
Thunder Bolt said:
Not one of them was convinced in the slightest of his guilt.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how you inferred this, unless you interviewed each juror? Technically every single one might have though he was probably guilty, but didn't think the evidence provided showed this beyond reasonable doubt.
 




M

marlowe

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2015
3,935
e77 said:
Would have thought the first thing the Police would have done would be secure CCTV footage.
Click to expand...
Maybe they did and the footage didn't support their case so they didn't use it as evidence. It wouldn't be the first time. It happened to me once when I was arrested at a demo and charged. Despite there being several police officers filming events that day no video evidence was produced to support their prosecution. I demanded to see all the video footage taken by the police around the time of my arrest. I found the incident of my arrest on their footage which furthermore confirmed my version of events was true and theirs was false. I produced the police video in evidence. Verdict: Not Guilty
 


GT49er

GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,716
Gloucester
Bad Ash said:
I'm not sure how you inferred this, unless you interviewed each juror? Technically every single one might have though he was probably guilty, but didn't think the evidence provided showed this beyond reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
What they thought is totally irrelevant - not that we have any clue about what they individually thought. What they decided, however, is legal fact; they thought about it (not for long) and unanimously decided he was not guilty. That's it - he's not guilty, and any snide suggestions otherwise could potentially be challenged in a civil court. That could - and should - be more of a concern than Huddersfield being on a good run!
 


sllugaes

sllugaes

New member
Dec 15, 2012
673
Nice to see Rohan receiving mom by the sponsors today, and a standing ovation from the crowd. Appears crowd were not impressed when subbed at 76 mins. He was on already on a yellow.
Hopefully he can now concentrate on his game, and get to show that he "is" actually a decent player, and aiming to play championship Football at some stage.

Sent by WEI Device
 


You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here