Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Neo-Nazi group National Action facing UK ban.



Feb 23, 2009
22,772
Brighton factually.....
A neo-Nazi group set to be banned in the UK has been described by the Home Secretary as "racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic".
National Action will this week become the first group engaged in extreme right-wing activities to be proscribed under British terrorism laws.
It means anyone who is a member or seeks support for the group faces arrest.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd said: "I am clear that the safety and security of our families, communities and country comes first.
"So today I am taking action to proscribe the neo-Nazi group National Action.
"This will mean that being a member of, or inviting support for, this organisation will be a criminal offence.
"National Action is a racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic organisation which stirs up hatred, glorifies violence and promotes a vile ideology, and I will not stand for it.
"It has absolutely no place in a Britain that works for everyone."
The ban comes into effect on Friday after an order was laid in Parliament on Monday, which will see the group outlawed under the Terrorism Act 2000.

Never heard of them until now. ???

From their website:

Vilified by the media and hated by this sick world, National Action is a growing community of young Nationalists in the United Kingdom, united in a mission to save our race and generation. We are a group who are tired of seeing injustice; our people exploited and abused, our women raped and murdered, society crumble, our nation dying. We were tired of all resistance to this being crushed, the right wing kicked around, people imprisoned for speaking their mind – so we struck out, we took a stand against the corrupt system to lay the foundations of a real change. We carry out demonstrations, publicity stunts, and other activities in order to grow and spread our message, that of National Socialism. If you are seeing this website for the first time it is probably because you have read or seen our activities.

We now have active groups in every region of the country and to supporters in key areas we offer social and physical activities in addition to friendship and the chance to act on your beliefs.
If you are young and you feel strongly about the issues that are facing our people you should take a look at our material and contact our group – you will not regret it. Alternatively consider donating to our organisation.

Never let yourself down, never say that you are not strong enough, that you are not ready enough, because you are not alone, because we are fighting the same battle and together we are power; power of will, power of oppressed, humiliated, forgotten people, but we shall fight and we will win!
 

The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Licker Extraordinaire
Jan 11, 2016
24,155
West is BEST
Whatever I think about leave voters I don't think they are national socialists and I sincerely believe most people in Britain would steer well clear of this group without a ban. In fact I think banning them is the wrong move.
 

Bob'n'weave

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2016
1,970
Nr Lewes
They look like a 'youth' version of the old NF. No intelligent arguments, just a ridiculous 'send 'em home' narrative that just does not wash with the British public anymore. Hate for hate's sake. Good riddance.
Maybe this is a move to pave the way for more bans on extremist groups that stir up racial and religious hate, and not just white groups? Know what I mean?
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
Maybe this is a move to pave the way for more bans on extremist groups that stir up racial and religious hate, and not just white groups? Know what I mean?

That already happens which is why a lot is being made of this being the first extreme right-wing group targeted.

I have a hunch that this might have come out of the back of / as a result of a certain, recent high-profile murder/ terrorism case.

I think I'm with [MENTION=33848]The Clamp[/MENTION] though. Not sure a ban is the answer.
 

The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Licker Extraordinaire
Jan 11, 2016
24,155
West is BEST
It's a tricky balance. My first instinct is to say ignore them and don't give them oxygen but then if they are genuinely seen as a threat ignoring them could be a bad move. I certainly think they should be kept an eye on but I really think having government statements and news stories about them just fuels their fire and actually strengthens their resolve.

Having said that they do seem to merely be a pathetic group of knuckleheads who won't make a particularly meaningful impact. Though I said that about UKIP.
 

spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
It's a tricky balance. My first instinct is to say ignore them and don't give them oxygen but then if they are genuinely seen as a threat ignoring them could be a bad move. I certainly think they should be kept an eye on but I really think having government statements and news stories about them just fuels their fire and actually strengthens their resolve.

Having said that they do seem to merely be a pathetic group of knuckleheads who won't make a particularly meaningful impact. Though I said that about UKIP.

Obviously I don't know but I would have thought it would be better to keep smallish groups like this under strong surveillance. I'm guessing by banning them you

a) Turn them into a cause célèbre
b) Force the protagonists to reorganise underground

Looks to me a bit of a headline grabber, which in reality doesn't really mean a huge amount.
 


pastafarian

Well-known member
Sep 4, 2011
11,902
Sussex
cant say ive ever heard of them
cant she kick Britain First into touch instead......no one want christian loons like them stomping up and down with their silly crucifixes
 

The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Licker Extraordinaire
Jan 11, 2016
24,155
West is BEST
Obviously I don't know but I would have thought it would be better to keep smallish groups like this under strong surveillance. I'm guessing by banning them you

a) Turn them into a cause célèbre
b) Force the protagonists to reorganise underground

Looks to me a bit of a headline grabber, which in reality doesn't really mean a huge amount.

Agreed.
 

Bob'n'weave

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2016
1,970
Nr Lewes
"National Action is a racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic organisation which stirs up hatred, glorifies violence and promotes a vile ideology, and I will not stand for it.
"It has absolutely no place in a Britain that works for everyone."


Seems like Amber Rudd is describing a number of extremist/radical group's underlying agendas who are operating in the UK. Maybe National Action didn't dress up their hate to be palatable enough for her? I think the ban is a good move because it opens the door for other more 'intelligent' and better branded orgs to be questioned about their agendas. Everyone is entitled to an opinion etc, but a group that, as Amber says, "stirs up hatred" can be applied other groups that do just that. Maybe they have just got their branding right??
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
"National Action is a racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic organisation which stirs up hatred, glorifies violence and promotes a vile ideology, and I will not stand for it.
"It has absolutely no place in a Britain that works for everyone."


Seems like Amber Rudd is describing a number of extremist/radical group's underlying agendas who are operating in the UK. Maybe National Action didn't dress up their hate to be palatable enough for her? I think the ban is a good move because it opens the door for other more 'intelligent' and better branded orgs to be questioned about their agendas. Everyone is entitled to an opinion etc, but a group that, as Amber says, "stirs up hatred" can be applied other groups that do just that. Maybe they have just got their branding right??

Here's a prior use of the same legislation - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8453560.stm
 
Last edited:

BeHereNow

New member
Mar 2, 2016
1,759
Southwick
"racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic" Read this bit and thought you were talking about Islam. Funny how that hasn't been banned.
 


brakespear

Doctor Worm
Feb 24, 2009
12,326
Sleeping on the roof
I have a hunch that this might have come out of the back of / as a result of a certain, recent high-profile murder/ terrorism case.
This is what the ban was mentioned in relation to on the news last night, as the group had been accused of celebrating the murder - although they denied this and said (if I read it correctly) that they only believe in 'legal violence'.
 

spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
This is what the ban was mentioned in relation to on the news last night, as the group had been accused of celebrating the murder - although they denied this and said (if I read it correctly) that they only believe in 'legal violence'.

Clever me. Sometimes 2 + 2 does make 4.

I wouldn't be surprised if there was more to it than that. Aren't we still on the lookout for Mair's accomplice? That's my hunch.
 


brighton fella

New member
Mar 20, 2009
1,645
It's a tricky balance. My first instinct is to say ignore them and don't give them oxygen but then if they are genuinely seen as a threat ignoring them could be a bad move. I certainly think they should be kept an eye on but I really think having government statements and news stories about them just fuels their fire and actually strengthens their resolve.

Having said that they do seem to merely be a pathetic group of knuckleheads who won't make a particularly meaningful impact. Though I said that about UKIP.

UKIP knuckleheads:lolol: what you mean men and women in their 80's.:lolol:

You sure have some learning to do when it comes to the far right, seems just about anyone who doesn't share your view fits in to that category. .
 

spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
"racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic" Read this bit and thought you were talking about Islam. Funny how that hasn't been banned.

Yeah. That's pretty much what this legislation was brought in for to be fair, hence why there's a big song and dance about it being used for a far right group.

Interesting point on a broader level about the far-right being as intolerant and as wound up by the same things as muslim fundamentalists. The difference is the far-right aren't used to typecast all christians in the same way that fundamentalist muslims are used to typecast all muslims.

Thomas Mair: Demented loner
Michael Adebolajo: Driven by ideology.

Interesting that of those two, only one had a documented history of mental illness.
 

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Paying the bills

Latest Discussions

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Paying the bills


Top
Link Here