Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Hemed stamp [Charged, appealed, banned for 3 games]



Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patreon
Oct 8, 2003
49,347
Faversham
Fair enough, he would know :)

Surely the FA couldn't give a longer ban to Hemed than they have to either Shelvey or Britos, just because we've appealed. Would look so petty and would be tantamount to saying that no-one is allowed to appeal ever.

But this is of course the FA

And that is exactly how it works. If you lose the appeal it is deemed automatically frivolous by definition. It is a ruse to deter appeals. Who would have thought?
 






DavePage

Well-known member
if he meant it, wouldn’t grind it in?
he is the only striker available, so does he do a hamstring overstretching or does he play safe with minimal damage? Umm no complaint from the player or the fat controller, go figure Premier League, give him a 16 game ban, yes really.
 


Shooting Star

Well-known member
Apr 29, 2011
2,794
Suffolk
Still don't get this one. From memory, he won the ball a second earlier right? We were winning, he'd scored and he'd won the ball. Everyone keeps watching the rearview angle of the incident, but the one that is front-on clearly shows that Tomer doesn't even look at Yedlin when he hops over him. Stamps usually happen when a player is petulant or frustrated. Tomer doesn't have a petulant or vindictive character, and he surely wouldn't have been considering that he was maybe having his best day in an Albion shirt. It doesn't make rational sense why any player would do that in that context. I don't think he should have been charged whatsoever, ridiculous. Rafa didn't even pick up on it. Too right the club should contest.
 




blue'n'white

Well-known member
Oct 5, 2005
3,080
2nd runway at Gatwick
Hemed appeal - rejected - three match ban

Apologies if this has been posted before but does anyone actually know when the three refs sit down and actually look at the video of the "incident" on Sunday.
I assume that, as the appeal had to be in by 6pm yesterday, they will do it today.

Thanks
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
55,575
Back in Sussex
The three refs looked on Monday and all agreed it was a red card offence, hence the charge.

I don’t know the process for the response/appeal but it sounds like we’ve submitted something (words and/or pictures and/or videos presumably) and then just wait for a decision.
 


Chinman3000

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
1,267
The three refs looked on Monday and all agreed it was a red card offence, hence the charge.

I don’t know the process for the response/appeal but it sounds like we’ve submitted something (words and/or pictures and/or videos presumably) and then just wait for a decision.

Will we know by the end of the week?
 












GloryDays

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2011
1,595
Leyton, E10.
People saying it's a ban should look at the highlights thread with its different angle and commentary. This is Sky creating a controversy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree. If this game was not on Sky it would have probably never been acknowledged. They've made themselves a nice little storyline there.
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patreon
Mar 27, 2013
52,024
Burgess Hill
Looks Like Friday could be D-Day.................from the FA Rules :

On the timing :

As a general guide, the following schedule will apply:

Match Day Notice and Evidence of Claim Reply Regulatory Commission
Fri/Sat/Sun Tuesday Thursday Friday

On the Misconduct

RULE E1 OF THE ASSOCIATION
A charge of Misconduct (as defined in and pursuant to Rule E1 of the Rules of The
Association) may be brought against a Player in relation to an incident whether or not the
same incident has been dealt with by the Referee and/or pursuant to these Procedures. In
deciding whether or not to bring a Charge under this paragraph, The Association will have
particular (but not exclusive) regard to the following:
(a) Any applicable Law(s) of the Game or Rules and Regulations or FIFA instructions
and/or guidelines;
(b) The nature of the incident, and in particular any intent, recklessness, negligence
or other state of mind of the Player;
(c) Where applicable, the level of force used;
(d) Any injury to any Participant caused by the incident;
(e) Any other impact on the game in which the incident occurred;
(f) The prevalence of the type of incident in question in football generally;
(g) The wider interests of football in applying consistent sanctions.

A Regulatory Commission considering a Charge under Rule E1 of the Rules of The
Association in such circumstances shall have regard to any punishment imposed under
these Procedures for the same incident when considering any punishment under
Regulation 8.1 (Penalties) of the Disciplinary Regulations

Full rules :

http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/rules-of-the-association
 






Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
55,575
Back in Sussex
Looks Like Friday could be D-Day.................from the FA Rules :

On the timing :

As a general guide, the following schedule will apply:

Match Day Notice and Evidence of Claim Reply Regulatory Commission
Fri/Sat/Sun Tuesday Thursday Friday

On the Misconduct

RULE E1 OF THE ASSOCIATION
A charge of Misconduct (as defined in and pursuant to Rule E1 of the Rules of The
Association) may be brought against a Player in relation to an incident whether or not the
same incident has been dealt with by the Referee and/or pursuant to these Procedures. In
deciding whether or not to bring a Charge under this paragraph, The Association will have
particular (but not exclusive) regard to the following:
(a) Any applicable Law(s) of the Game or Rules and Regulations or FIFA instructions
and/or guidelines;
(b) The nature of the incident, and in particular any intent, recklessness, negligence
or other state of mind of the Player;
(c) Where applicable, the level of force used;
(d) Any injury to any Participant caused by the incident;
(e) Any other impact on the game in which the incident occurred;
(f) The prevalence of the type of incident in question in football generally;
(g) The wider interests of football in applying consistent sanctions.

A Regulatory Commission considering a Charge under Rule E1 of the Rules of The
Association in such circumstances shall have regard to any punishment imposed under
these Procedures for the same incident when considering any punishment under
Regulation 8.1 (Penalties) of the Disciplinary Regulations

Full rules :

http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/rules-of-the-association

The Traore (ban upheld) and Lansbury (appeal accepted and ban rescinded) decisions came out on a Thursday with the game having only taken place two days earlier on the Tuesday earlier this month >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/41273608

(Slightly different as they were reds issued on the field itself, I appreciate)
 


papajaff

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2005
3,968
Brighton
I haven't actually seen the stamp but does it look bad? Be honest.
 










dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patreon
Mar 27, 2013
52,024
Burgess Hill
For me :

If the ref had seen it, would have been somewhere between a yellow and a red
The panel will back the charge and won't agree the appeal because they almost never do
The appeal won't be seen as frivolous given the element of doubt being expressed
3 game ban coming
Brown up front on Sunday and will score
 



Paying the bills

Latest Discussions

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here