Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Exactly... because they're a better balanced team than we are and Fulham are. Your agenda is that playing attacking football has dire consequences because you're up against better sides but that simply isn't what most are calling for. They're asking for more balanced football. For every Fulham who become too attacking, there's a Bournemouth, a Southampton for a fair few years, Swansea for a fair few years, all of whom played good, balanced football against good sides. None of these teams felt the need to sit back the whole game waiting to be spanked.
You think some of us need a reality check. I'd argue you do. If you genuinely think that the issues we have aren't tactical, then you've not been watching us very closely in the whole time CH has been our manager.
What, where on earth have I said that? Can't waste time discussing with you if you're just going to read what you feel like into other people's posts. Other's appear to have understood my posts well enough, so pretty sure it's not a lack of clarity on my part.