Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

India v England: Fourth Test, Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai 8-12 December







jakarta

Well-known member
May 25, 2007
15,621
Sullington
Spot on

BTW, five England players have made triple centuries but only two since WW2, Gooch being one

From a quick look at Cricinfo it was either Len Hutton or Wally Hammond, can't believe you would drop either of them, presumably a social faux pas must have taken place? :lolol:
 




ManOfSussex

We wunt be druv
Apr 11, 2016
14,745
Rape of Hastings, Sussex
Another trivia question then - last England batsman to score a hundred in the first innings of a test match on debut?
 


Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
16,641
Fiveways
So, after 35 tests, I'm now sure Moeen Ali isn't good enough to make this side as either batsman or bowler.

If Rashid continues to outbowl him in this series, I'd like to see England try and find a proper batsman at number 5, Stokes 6, Bairstow 7, Woakes 8, Rashid 9 for series where only one spinner is needed.

Rashid is capable of batting far better in tests than we've seen so far. He has 10 first class hundreds to his name, more than competent enough for a Test Match Number 9.

Just to prove that I can disagree with you :wink:, I think this is somewhat premature. We'd need to find better batsmen than Moeen for it to apply. There are two that have put their names forward in this series, but they'll need to prove themselves in the long run. If Rashid really does come through, and especially in English conditions, then there's an argument for playing just three seamers, and using Moeen in short bursts, as he tends to take his wickets early. Alternatively, we could play six bowlers, which we've done on this tour.
The key question for England is finding specialist batsmen to complement Cook and Root.
 








ManOfSussex

We wunt be druv
Apr 11, 2016
14,745
Rape of Hastings, Sussex
Seem to recall Matt Prior scored a century on debut vs the West Indies?

Is the right answer.

Just been on the BBC live text, Cook and, before that, Strauss. I did know that anyway. Honest.

Not in the 1st innings though. Jennings is 1 of only 5 England batsman to score tons in the 1st innings on debut - WG Grace, George Gunn, Billy Griffith and Matt Prior are the others.
 




Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
16,641
Fiveways
Is the right answer.



Not in the 1st innings though. Jennings is 1 of only 5 England batsman to score tons in the 1st innings on debut - WG Grace, George Gunn, Billy Griffith and Matt Prior are the others.

I must read questions more carefully
I must read questions more carefully
I must read questions more carefully
I must read questions more carefully
I must read questions more carefully
I must read questions more carefully
I must read questions more carefully
I must read questions more carefully

Etc
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
We'd need to find better batsmen than Moeen for it to apply.

Of course. And clearly it may be premature but it appears we may have just found two. I just think Ali is playing two roles not quite well enough at the moment, I think he is more likely to make it as a Test Match 5, good occasional bowler than he is as a Test Match 8 and frontline spinner.

If Rashid continues to impress, I foresee a scenario where England fudge a selection playing Rashid and Ali in a home test series with Ali batting at 5. The pressure will then be on him to start making runs consistently. If Rashid were to start chucking pies again, I'd ber looking to replace him with a specialist spinner and using Ali in that role as a last resort.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,336
Uffern
From a quick look at Cricinfo it was either Len Hutton or Wally Hammond, can't believe you would drop either of them, presumably a social faux pas must have taken place? :lolol:

They were two of the five triple hundred makers but neither of them was dropped (I'm sure plenty of people wanted to drop Hammond for his behaviour but he was too good a batsman). You're missing the first England player to score 300 (indeed, the first test cricketer from anywhere)

And, for your bonus, who was the other post-war triple centurion (ie apart from GG)?
 




spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
They were two of the five triple hundred makers but neither of them was dropped (I'm sure plenty of people wanted to drop Hammond for his behaviour but he was too good a batsman). You're missing the first England player to score 300 (indeed, the first test cricketer from anywhere)

And, for your bonus, who was the other post-war triple centurion (ie apart from GG)?

John Edrich.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,524
[MENTION=34106]ManOfSussex[/MENTION] [MENTION=25]Gwylan[/MENTION] [MENTION=14921]spring hall convert[/MENTION]

The last England batsman to score a century and be dropped from the next test was Hick in 1998. Having scored a ton against Sri Lanka at The Oval he was dropped for the first Test of the Australia tour.
 






Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,524
Andy Sandham. Why was he dropped out of interest?

He was quite old when he created that record. I think he may have been injured and his career was pretty much halted.
 








Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,336
Uffern
John Edrich.

Correct

Andy Sandham. Why was he dropped out of interest?

It's a bit of cheat, England actually had two tours that winter but, in the days before A teams, they were both given official test status. Sandham was on the tour to the West Indies, led by the Hon Freddie Calthorpe (those were the days, don't bother about cricketers, get a nob in) while the tour to NZ had Sussex's Ted Bowley and Arthur Gilligan as two of the three openers.

Missing from both tours were Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe ,who played in the first test against Australia that summer. (Hobbs' last series). Sandham, Gilligan, Bowley and Dawson never played for England again.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,336
Uffern
He was quite old when he created that record. I think he may have been injured and his career was pretty much halted.

He was 40 but played FC for another eight years. He went on tour the following winter to South Africa but was injured there (he broke his leg in a motor-bike accident) - that's why he didn't play another test
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here