[Football] Fulham proving all out attack doesn't work in the PL

Wozza said:

I missed the match, but their defensive record suggests we gave them too much respect at The Amex?

Click to expand...

Weststander said:

I was there. We actually came out of the blocks, attacking, playing well, Fulham weren’t in it. Then we fell asleep on about 35 minutes giving them the lead and confidence.

Click to expand...

KZNSeagull said:

Not been paying attention to them. but Martin Keown said on Final Score that the manager changes the team and formation every game including playing Sessegnon at left back. If true, it shows that having a plan and sticking to it is what works, not faffing about trying to justify spending shedloads of money.

Click to expand...

clarkey said:

It's funny because a few blokes behind me spent most of the second half shouting at Hughton, calling him all sorts of names and screaming at him for negativity, lack of changes etc. You may be surprised to hear their chant of 'Chrissy Hughton is a tosser' didn't catch on

Click to expand...

Weststander said:

I was there. We actually came out of the blocks, attacking, playing well, Fulham weren’t in it. Then we fell asleep on about 35 minutes giving them the lead and confidence.

Click to expand...

Commander said:

It’s hardly a shock, is it? Anyone who knows anything about football could see what was going to happen to them. You can’t play football like that at the top level without top class players.

Click to expand...

Harry Wilson's tackle said:

They spent a lot of money....trick is, walk before you run.

Our club is smarter. Fact.

Click to expand...

Commander said:

Absolutely. And it’s the same reason why we are going to be in a far better position than Palace over then next ten years- because we plan for the long-term, and they plan for the short-term.

Click to expand...

Stat Brother said:

They plan you say...




...me thinks someone been at the cooking sherry.

Click to expand...