Pevenseagull
Anti-greed coalition
- Jul 20, 2003
- 19,636
Don't understand this... Does it show empirical proof that Balogun is a rubbish defender who never makes any mistakes that lead to goals?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Liam Moore
- Thread starter forumwayseagull
- Start date
Don't understand this... Does it show empirical proof that Balogun is a rubbish defender who never makes any mistakes that lead to goals?
No, that’s what’ll be on here after his first proper 5 mins of action
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
- Oct 4, 2003
- 11,082
Not sure but I don’t think a 50 year old 5ft 7 former Celtic midfielder is the right choice for our 4th centre back. For a start he doesn’t qualify as home grown.
warmleyseagull
Well-known member
Nope, means the last player we want as central defender is Dunk cos he only gets one star., Good work.
That post was in the voice of Clement, not Hughton. Do keep up [emoji23][emoji23]
[tweet]1023626701811666944[/tweet]
BensGrandad
New member
Does anybody consider that Liam Moore is better than either or both Duffy and Dunk
seagull_special
Well-known member
There are rules in place regarding illegal approaches and I don’t think that is the way we operate as a club. It has been reported that we have made a number of bids for Moore but a number of parties could have made them public? When a Club makes an approach to another club they have an obligation to inform the player. This brings agents into the equation and they have a vested interest in getting the best deal for the player they represent and they may take the opportunity to make the approach public to flush out further bidders. I have no problem with transfer request as long as players respect the decision of the parent club.
Johnny RoastBeef
These aren't the players you're looking for.
- Jan 11, 2016
- 3,158
Not mistakes like Duffy's back pass against Huddersfield.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
- Oct 4, 2003
- 11,082
My bad, although I’m pretty certain even Reading would say no.
Never underestimate the tinpottedness of the tinpotted lot......[emoji23][emoji23]
seagull_special
Well-known member
Does anybody consider that Dunk or Duffy could get suspended or injured or sold in January or next summer, the club plans for short term, mid term and long term. Proactive as opposed to reactive. This is a highly professional operation.
BensGrandad
New member
I accept that but mine was just a straight question as to his ability and what all his advocates say.
It certainly beats throwing money away on a 'free' aging pro with no sell on value.
It would seem the club are maneuvering itself into a position where it can say "Lewis Dunk - how much"?
As opposed to our friends up the road who would be completely shafted by losing Zahahahaha, and equally shafted by keeping him against his will.
He may think he is.That's maybe why he wants to join a premier league club, to see if he can cut it at this level. He knows it may take a bit of time to take to get his opportunity. But there's a good chance, with form ,injury's , suspensions, he will get to show what he can do.
A load of inappropriate prepositions and sentence construction it would seem.
warmleyseagull
Well-known member
Define better. My guess is that CH wants adequate challenge to CDs that neither particularly had last season (CG and UH were always 3rd and 4th) and option to look at CDs who MAY offer a broader range of skill, especially offensively.
Hope no-one looks at CH’s comments with any kind of grammatical eye........
I find it hard to believe that the club is actively recruiting 'better' than 2 of last season best players.
As said a 'big money' transfer feels more like future proofing to me.
