[Albion] Duffy suspended??

G

GloryDays

Well-known member

Jul 5, 2011

1,606

Leyton, E10.

• Dec 16, 2017

• #21

I also think Jose Izq will get reprimanded for what looked like a terrible dive.

 

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP

Jul 5, 2003

61,767

Location Location

• Dec 16, 2017

• #22

GloryDays said:

I also think Jose Izq will get reprimanded for what looked like a terrible dive.

Click to expand...

It WAS a terrible dive. And when he still had a chance of getting to the cuffing BALL, if he hadn't gone Swan Lake. Frustrating and embarrassing.

 

LowKarate

New member

Jan 6, 2004

2,002

Wombling free

• Dec 16, 2017

• #23

Brian Munich said:

The local Lancing spunk-buckets will be frothing at the minge at the thought of Shane Duffy out on the piss next Friday night.

Click to expand...

Are they per chance related to the Worcestershire Spunk-Buckets?

 

B

BensGrandad

New member

Jul 13, 2003

72,015

Haywards Heath

• Dec 16, 2017

• #24

So Watford will be missing 3 regular players. I sent off last week, Deeney today and Docoure 5th yellow.

 

West Upper Seagull

Well-known member

Oct 31, 2003

1,513

Woodingdean

• Dec 16, 2017

• #25

saafend_seagull said:

Watfords best player picked up his fifth yellow today, doucoure (and fatboy sent off)

Click to expand...

That is great news about Doucoure being banned next week - i’ve been really impressed with what i’ve seen of him this season, he seems to pull all the strings for Watford. Their disciplinary record is absolutely shocking - 3 players sent off in 3 consecutive games now ! they’ve got 3 key players missing next week then.

 

B

BrianWade4

Well-known member

Aug 17, 2010

3,152

A nice bit of South London

• Dec 16, 2017

• #26

The Wookiee said:

Does the booking he picked up today mean he’s now suspended?

Click to expand...

Yes
So....
The question is, why did he do it?

 

Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Jul 23, 2003

34,198

Up and Coming Sunny Portslade

• Dec 16, 2017

• #27

Both our centre backs were totally boneheaded today. Duffy getting booked for such a blatant handball that I also thought it was tactical to miss Watford rather than Chelsea. Dunk got booked for stupid and needless dissent to move on to 4 yellows. Silly

 

OzMike

Well-known member

Oct 2, 2006

12,938

Perth Australia

• Dec 17, 2017

• #28

How about getting the Hunnie monster in for a game, hasn't done much wrong when he does get the chance.

 

Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75

Oct 4, 2003

11,076

• Dec 17, 2017

• #29

GloryDays said:

I also think Jose Izq will get reprimanded for what looked like a terrible dive.

Click to expand...

He can’t be as it didn’t lead to a penalty or sending off, only players who successfully deceive an official with a dive can be retrospectively banned.

 

PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Sep 15, 2004

18,704

Hurst Green

• Dec 17, 2017

• #30

GloryDays said:

I also think Jose Izq will get reprimanded for what looked like a terrible dive.

Click to expand...

He can’t because he did get anything

 

neilbard

Hedging up

Oct 8, 2013

6,245

Tyringham

• Dec 17, 2017

• #31

Not the most intelligent from Duffy, now misses what is a winnable game against Watford and will be back for the damage limitation against Chelsea, nice one.

 

Guy Fawkes

The voice of treason

Sep 29, 2007

8,200

• Dec 17, 2017

• #32

Guinness Boy said:

Both our centre backs were totally boneheaded today. Duffy getting booked for such a blatant handball that I also thought it was tactical to miss Watford rather than Chelsea. Dunk got booked for stupid and needless dissent to move on to 4 yellows. Silly

Click to expand...

If he didn't, it drops to one of their players and they break quickly so he took one for the team

Wasn't Dunk booked for a 'nothing much in it' clash in their penalty area, as he was trying to get back and being blocked by one of their players, so he pushed him? The ref waited until the next break in play and booked him for it. (that is what it seemed like to me but i may be wrong and i didn't see anything to suggest dissent was a reason)

 

B

BensGrandad

New member

Jul 13, 2003

72,015

Haywards Heath

• Dec 17, 2017

• #33

bbc said it was for dissent so he obviously said something to the ref. At least he is free to play against Watford with either Goldson or BFG coming in which will not be too bad as Deeney is suspended.

 

T

theboybilly

Well-known member

Apr 25, 2013

6,179

Along the Shoreham Road in er, Shoreham

• Dec 17, 2017

• #34

PILTDOWN MAN said:

He can’t because he did get anything

Click to expand...

He got a 9 from me

 

Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Jul 23, 2003

34,198

Up and Coming Sunny Portslade

• Dec 17, 2017

• #35

Guy Fawkes said:

If he didn't, it drops to one of their players and they break quickly so he took one for the team

Wasn't Dunk booked for a 'nothing much in it' clash in their penalty area, as he was trying to get back and being blocked by one of their players, so he pushed him? The ref waited until the next break in play and booked him for it. (that is what it seemed like to me but i may be wrong and i didn't see anything to suggest dissent was a reason)

Click to expand...

Ref clearly indicated dissent


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk