Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Boris Johnson & London Stadium deal



Rowdey

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
2,537
Herne Hill
Khan said on Radio today, that West Ham were offered a better deal than what they asked for..! :wozza:

Isn't Baroness Brady a Conservative Life Peer in the House of Lords..?
 




GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,757
Gloucester
Because the stadium had to be seen to be being used to prevent it being called a waste of taxpayers money. So a deal, any deal had to be done with someone to take the heat off, at least for a while.

Any deal better than no deal? Hmmm.....sounds familiar..........
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,757
Gloucester
Everyone that voted for them does.

As does every couldn't-care-lesser who couldn't be arsed to turn out and vote. And probably most people who wasted their vote on a Lib Dem candidate that didn't have a cat in hell's chance too.
 


getreal1

Active member
Aug 13, 2008
703
Unloading the stadium was always an issue whether it was Socialist or Tory decision making,

Usual boring platitudes were heard which are always given by countries and GB was no different. Along the lines of .... legacy... wonderful facilities for generations to come....more young people will play sport in coming years...

Actually stuck with a big stadium which nobody knew what to do with and no discernible increase in sporting participation in the target groups, legacy? Great Olympics but beyond that, not much.
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,315
Because the stadium had to be seen to be being used to prevent it being called a waste of taxpayers money. So a deal, any deal had to be done with someone to take the heat off, at least for a while.
Every city that hosts the Olympics has the same problem with what to do with the venues afterwards. And every city gets into financial trouble as a result.

The Olympics should have a permanent home in Athens to stop all this nonsense.

and thats the whole story right there. there was no other viable use for the stadium and compared to most other hosts, we've done pretty well. most are funded at large expense only to be bearly usable, some facilities simply become derelict. you could almost say West Ham have done London a favour by keeping it in use.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,757
Gloucester
Another toff Brexit elite getting shown up for what he is

Dear oh dear! I know you are driven to incoherent rage to the point of distraction by the fact that we voted to leave the EU, but the fact is that the deal with the porn twins to rent the stadium on the cheap has nothing to do with Brexit. The deal was done some time before the referendum, so it would still be a shitty deal, even if the referendum had gone the other way.
 


Hampster Gull

New member
Dec 22, 2010
13,462
Dear oh dear! I know you are driven to incoherent rage to the point of distraction by the fact that we voted to leave the EU, but the fact is that the deal with the porn twins to rent the stadium on the cheap has nothing to do with Brexit. The deal was done some time before the referendum, so it would still be a shitty deal, even if the referendum had gone the other way.

:kiss: I think you won, the country and it’s people lost. Boris the Toff showning here his motives
 




GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,757
Gloucester
Unloading the stadium was always an issue whether it was Socialist or Tory decision making,

Usual boring platitudes were heard which are always given by countries and GB was no different. Along the lines of .... legacy... wonderful facilities for generations to come....more young people will play sport in coming years...

Actually stuck with a big stadium which nobody knew what to do with and no discernible increase in sporting participation in the target groups, legacy? Great Olympics but beyond that, not much.
Yes, sadly there was that awkward requirement to bang on about 'legacy' in the bidding process, although the problem could probably have been solved by more money in the 'right places' - nudge, nudge, know what I mean?

Then we could have pulled it down and built several hundred much needed affordable council rented homes, with an infrastructure of schools, health centres and other facilities. Now, that would have been a legacy!
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,873
Oh Well , it's only a stadium, at least nobody trusted him on anything important
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,757
Gloucester
:kiss: I think you won, the country and it’s people lost. Boris the Toff showning here his motives

First part's right. Can't agree the second part - I wouldn't have voted leave were it not the best thing for the country.




And don't ever f**kin' KISS me again!
 




Super Steve Earle

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2009
8,365
North of Brighton
Tory darling Boris waves through dodgy deal that greatly benefits some rich tories, costs the taxpayer money and further impoverishes the poor and vulnerable.

Not exactly a new story is it.

Yes, but Tory darling Boris also says Labour darling Ken Livingstone waved it through. If I gave a monkey's, I'd wonder which one it really was!
 












Lindfield by the Pond

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2009
1,887
Lindfield (near the pond)
and thats the whole story right there. there was no other viable use for the stadium and compared to most other hosts, we've done pretty well. most are funded at large expense only to be bearly usable, some facilities simply become derelict. you could almost say West Ham have done London a favour by keeping it in use.

Can anyone imagine what the London Stadium with West Ham in it with Championship football being played there will look like? 10,000 rattling around? Can't hear anyone when they are full at 50,000, when 10,000 are there? Be like a park game.......

Not sure West Ham have done anyone a favour, least themselves. Best knock it down and build something that has some more purpose.
 


LVGull

New member
May 13, 2016
1,959
Can anyone imagine what the London Stadium with West Ham in it with Championship football being played there will look like? 10,000 rattling around? Can't hear anyone when they are full at 50,000, when 10,000 are there? Be like a park game.......

Not sure West Ham have done anyone a favour, least themselves. Best knock it down and build something that has some more purpose.

Yes I can imagine it.
 






GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,757
Gloucester
Can anyone imagine what the London Stadium with West Ham in it with Championship football being played there will look like? 10,000 rattling around? Can't hear anyone when they are full at 50,000, when 10,000 are there? Be like a park game.......

Not sure West Ham have done anyone a favour, least themselves. Best knock it down and build something that has some more purpose.
Maybe West Ham could ground-share with Leyton Orient?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here