Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 56
  1. #1
    Back From The Dead The Wookiee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    12,045

    We should have bought Krull on a one year contract..,,


    1 Not allowed!
    This would have left us an opportunity to get a striker on loan !

    Why waste our last loan deal on an ageing keeper when a striker is our main priority ??

    I've mentioned this in a few other threads but feels it deserves a thread of its own !!


    Discuss !!

    • North Stand Chat

      advertising
      Join Date: Jul 2003
      Posts: Lots

        


    • #2
      Progressive Patriot clapham_gull's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Posts
      16,930


      1 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by The Wookiee View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      This would have left us an opportunity to get a striker on loan !

      Why waste our last loan deal on an ageing keeper when a striker is our main priority ??

      I've mentioned this in a few other threads but feels it deserves a thread of its own !!


      Discuss !!
      Yeah, but you working on the basis that a last minute loan deal for a goalkeeper scuppered an even last minute loan deal for a striker.

      You don't know that.

      If Krul has arrived last week you might have an argument.

      But it doesn't look great does it ?

      On the outside it looks like the failed medical on the striker dropped a bomb. In retrospect ( and hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it ?) get the striker confirmed FIRST then deal with the rest.
    • #3
      Harry Wilson's Tackle Harry Wilson's tackle's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2003
      Location
      Faversham
      Posts
      5,666


      0 Not allowed!
      Mentioned (and ignored) on another thread. If you have a time machine, go back and fix it.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0Q93v7hGZA

      Premier League : Brighton, le club le plus cool d'Angleterre
    • #4
      Back From The Dead The Wookiee's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2003
      Location
      Worthing
      Posts
      12,045


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by clapham_gull View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Yeah, but you working on the basis that a last minute loan deal for a goalkeeper scuppered an even last minute loan deal for a striker.

      You don't know that.

      If Krul has arrived last week you might have an argument.
      Rubbish !!

      A striker has always been our main priority !

      We had one last card at a loan, we still had no striker, but they used the last loan on a keeper, which I'm sure we could have bought !!

      Crazy !!!
    • #5
      Test 805843 Kazenga <3's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2010
      Location
      Team c/r HQ
      Posts
      4,656


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by The Wookiee View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      This would have left us an opportunity to get a striker on loan !

      Why waste our last loan deal on an ageing keeper when a striker is our main priority ??

      I've mentioned this in a few other threads but feels it deserves a thread of its own !!


      Discuss !!
      Agree... but with hindsight I suppose.


      Think Janssen would probably have been willing on a season long loan deal. Permanent switch from Spurs to here on the other hand? Hard to be too critical of his decision really.
    • #6
      Back From The Dead The Wookiee's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2003
      Location
      Worthing
      Posts
      12,045


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Harry Wilson's tackle View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Mentioned (and ignored) on another thread. If you have a time machine, go back and fix it.
      Did we need a keeper more than a striker No !! So why use the last loan on a keeper, especially as we probably could have bought him for next to nothing ?
    • #7
      Members
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      Liverpool
      Posts
      1,027


      0 Not allowed!
      I think the bigger question is why we had to go for Krul at all. Seems to me the the reason is because there are now doubts over Ryan...
    • #8
      Unregistered Abuser lizard's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Posts
      2,056


      0 Not allowed!
      Maybe Krul wouldn't have wanted a permanent deal, he probably fancies his chances of staying in the prem.
    • #9
      Back From The Dead The Wookiee's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2003
      Location
      Worthing
      Posts
      12,045


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Kazenga <3 View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Agree... but with hindsight I suppose.


      Think Janssen would probably have been willing on a season long loan deal. Permanent switch from Spurs to here on the other hand? Hard to be too critical of his decision really.
      As I said, we needed a striker more than a keeper, no reason why we should not have bought Krull, therefore leaving the spare loan deal for the position we really needed !!
    • #10
      Members
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Bracknell
      Posts
      1,251


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by scousefan View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      I think the bigger question is why we had to go for Krul at all. Seems to me the the reason is because there are now doubts over Ryan...
      Agreed, we've obviously got huge doubts on Ryan and the decision to part with Stockdale and loan Walton seems a poor one.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
yyy