Player ratings - Barnet (h)

Skaville

Well-known member

Jun 10, 2004

10,100

Queens Park

• Aug 22, 2017

• #1

Maenpaa - 6
Bong - 6
Rosenior - 7
Goodson - 7
Uwe - 8
Molomby - 7
Ince - 6
AK - 7
Skalak - 6
Towell - 5
Hemed - 6

New right back - 6
Tilley - 6
Connolly - 5

 

M

Machiavelli

Well-known member

Oct 11, 2013

16,642

Fiveways

• Aug 22, 2017

• #2

Maenpaa - 7
Bong - 6
Rosenior - 6
Goldson - 8.5 MotM
Uwe - 8
Molomby - 7
Ince - 6
AK - 7
Skalak - 5
Towell - 4
Hemed - 6

Mateju - 7
Tilley - 7
Connolly - n/a

 

Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...

Mar 18, 2010

29,788

Hove

• Aug 22, 2017

• #3

Maenpaa 7
Bong 5
Uwe 7
Goldson 7
Rosenior 6
Skalak 5
Ince 7
Molomby 8 motm
Knockeart 6
Towell 5
Hemed 4

Tilley 7
Connolly 6
Mateju 6

 

Bruntburger

New member

Mar 9, 2009

1,138

Peacehaven

• Aug 22, 2017

• #4

Skaville said:

Maenpaa - 6
Bong - 6
Rosenior - 7
Goodson - 7
Uwe - 8
Molomby - 7
Ince - 6
AK - 7
Skalak - 6
Towell - 5
Hemed - 6

New right back - 6
Tilley - 6
Connolly - 5

Click to expand...

Spot on for me, although Hemed would be a 5


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Notters

Well-known member

Oct 20, 2003

24,869

Guiseley

• Aug 22, 2017

• #5

Knockaert shouldn't get 7s after the silly booking.

Maenpaa - 7
Bong - 6
Rosenior - 7
Goldson - 7
Uwe - 7
Molomby - 8 MOM
Ince - 5
AK - 5 (a 7 if he hadn't got the daft booking)
Skalak - 3
Towell - 4
Hemed - 5

Mateju - 7
Tilley - 7
Connolly - n/a

 

Marshy

Well-known member

Jul 6, 2003

19,718

FRUIT OF THE BLOOM

• Aug 22, 2017

• #6

Maenpaa 7

Rosenior 6
Bong 5
Uwe 6
Goldson 6

Knockaert 7
Molumby 7
Ince 5
Skalak 4

Towell 5
Hemed 5

Tilley 7
Mateju 6

 

Buzzer

Languidly Clinical

Oct 1, 2006

26,121

• Aug 22, 2017

• #7

Didn't recognise enough players to give a player by player score but I liked Ince, Hunemeier and Maenpaa's performances tonight and thought Skalak was absolutely awful. One of the worst matches I've seen from him. Knockaert was okay but I score him down with some very silly and pointless arguing with the lino in the first half.

 

The Fifth Column

Retired ex-cop

Nov 30, 2010

4,015

Escaped from Corruption

• Aug 22, 2017

• #8

Maenpaa - 7 Solid and no nonsense
Bong - 5 Delivery and passing dreadful at times, not looking sharp
Rosenior - 7 Pretty solid and did his job well
Goldson - 7 Good to see winning headers and assured on the ball
Uwe - 8 As above
Molomby - 7 Good effort from the youngster, would like to have seen him run with the ball more
Ince - 7 Looked back to what he is capable of
AK - 6 A rather petulant display, not his best
Skalak - 5 Awful
Towell - 4 - Theres a reason he's nowhere near the first team.
Hemed - 5 Slow.

New right back - Didn't notice him once.
Tilley - 6.5
Connolly - Not enough time to rate.

 

Last edited: Aug 22, 2017

S

SeagullRic

New member

Jan 13, 2008

1,399

brighton

• Aug 22, 2017

• #9

Notters said:

Knockaert shouldn't get 7s after the silly booking.

Maenpaa - 7
Bong - 6
Rosenior - 7
Goldson - 7
Uwe - 7
Molomby - 8 MOM
Ince - 5
AK - 5 (a 7 if he hadn't got the daft booking)
Skalak - 3
Towell - 4
Hemed - 5

Mateju - 7
Tilley - 7
Connolly - n/a

Click to expand...

This looks pretty spot on to me, Jiri had a shocker and Molomby looked very impressive

 

Lush

Mods' Pet

Jul 5, 2003

13,409

Wherever I lay my hat, that's my hat.

• Aug 22, 2017

• #10

Tonights points scores are the same as all our games at the moment.

Quite good at defending especially down the middle, but no creativity.

 

G

GooGull

New member

Aug 14, 2016

667

• Aug 22, 2017

• #11

Maenpaa - 7 looked assured and one great save
Bong - 5 not convincing
Rosenior - 4 sorry I like him but not good at all
Goldson - 7 nice to see him back on a football field
Uwe - 8 very accomplished defender
Molomby - 7 very tidy and worked hard
Ince - 7 one of the few to get stuck in
AK - 5 lucky not to see red after his ruck with the linesman (he did look like our only way to goal though)
Skalak - 5 poor
Towell - 5 got a lot to do to get in a poor first XI
Hemed - 5 sorry not got it for me

Mateju - 6 not on long but looked positive and liked the way he broke forward
Tilley - 6 nice finish
Connolly - 5 difficult for him, all he was getting was high balls. No chance

 

O

osgood

Well-known member

Apr 17, 2011

1,511

brighton

• Aug 22, 2017

• #12

Bold Seagull said:

Maenpaa 7
Bong 5
Uwe 7
Goldson 7
Rosenior 6
Skalak 5
Ince 7
Molomby 8 motm
Knockeart 6
Towell 5
Hemed 4

Tilley 7
Connolly 6
Mateju 6

Click to expand...

about right ...

 

Skaville

Well-known member

Jun 10, 2004

10,100

Queens Park

• Aug 22, 2017

• Thread starter
• #13

GooGull said:

Maenpaa - 7 looked assured and one great save
Bong - 5 not convincing
Rosenior - 4 sorry I like him but not good at all
Goldson - 7 nice to see him back on a football field
Uwe - 8 very accomplished defender
Molomby - 7 very tidy and worked hard
Ince - 7 one of the few to get stuck in
AK - 5 lucky not to see red after his ruck with the linesman (he did look like our only way to goal though)
Skalak - 5 poor
Towell - 5 got a lot to do to get in a poor first XI
Hemed - 5 sorry not got it for me

Mateju - 6 not on long but looked positive and liked the way he broke forward
Tilley - 6 nice finish
Connolly - 5 difficult for him, all he was getting was high balls. No chance

Click to expand...

You thought our worst player was Rosenior

 

Luke93

STAND OR FALL

Jun 23, 2013

5,030

Shoreham

• Aug 22, 2017

• #14

Maenpaa 7
Bong 4
Uwe 7
Goldson 7
Rosenior 6
Skalak 5
Ince 6.5
Molomby 7
Knockeart 6, silly yellow
Towell 4
Hemed 4

Tilley 7
Connolly 6
Mateju 6

Very disappointed from Hemed and Skalak, I marked them down because they should have created so much more. Ince surprised me a lot, he always looks good verses L2 & 1 teams.

 

Dorset Seagull

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull

Feb 21, 2009

4,426

Shaftesbury Dorset ( Hovis hill to you )

• Aug 22, 2017

• #15

Didn't see or hear the game but how does Hemed score so low? Surely this was his chance to bag a few. Was it his poor performance or the lack of support around him as I would expect a Prem striker to have a field day against a team from the lower leagues

 

Rookie

Greetings

Feb 8, 2005

12,065

• Aug 22, 2017

• #16

MoM to Molumby for me. Goldson and Uwe did what was expected of them. Other than that Ince looked decent and as for Towell and Skalak it's like they have given up, two dreadful performances.

 

H

HCxUK

Well-known member

Apr 18, 2014

823

• Aug 22, 2017

• #17

Maenpaa - 8
Bong - 5
Rosenior - 8
Goldson - 8
Uwe - 8 - MOM
Molomby - 7 - Assured debut
Ince - 6
AK - 5
Skalak - 4 - Embarrassingly poor
Towell - 5
Hemed - 4 - Anonymous

Mateju - 6
Tilley - 7
Connolly - 5

 

S

samtheseagull

Well-known member

Sep 15, 2010

1,599

• Aug 22, 2017

• #18

Maenpaa 7 one very good save
Bong 6
Uwe 8 very easy for the German tonight
Goldson 8 class above
Rosenior 6 thought he looks fairly rusty
Skalak 5 looks shot to bits. confidence completely gone
Ince 7 decent at times
Molomby 8 only turned 18 a few weeks ago, what a prospect he is
Knockeart 6 splitting up with his misses has made him very angry by looks of things.
Towell 4 poor tonight
Hemed 5 didn't offer much but was not supported at all

Tilley 6.5 took goal well
Connolly not long enough
Mateju 7 looked very quick hard to tell how well he can defend at the moment

 

O

osgood

Well-known member

Apr 17, 2011

1,511

brighton

• Aug 22, 2017

• #19

How many of tonights squad would any other premiership club be interested in ??

 

C

CliveWalkerWingWizard

Well-known member

Aug 31, 2006

2,667

surrenden

• Aug 22, 2017

• #20

Meanpaa 6
Bong 4
Goldson7
Big 7
Rosenior 7
Ince 7
Molumby 8 very impressive , through ball made the goal and very tidy
Ak 6
Skalak 4 time to move on
Towell 5 not good enough for our level
Hemed 5 like his commitment, and he his a good footballer, but not fast or strong enough for premier league