Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Another one who liked Schelotto. His heading skills are good, & he'll be an asset when he's settled in the team. I thought Krul was superb but then Ive been a fan of his for many years.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Sporting CP’s Ezequiel Schelotto (defender) *signed* on permanent 3yr deal
- Thread starter jamie the seagull
- Start date
mr sheen
Well-known member
- Jan 17, 2008
- 1,552
Would he catch it?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
If Ryan had played, we'd have lost 2-0, before any extra time, which wouldn't have been needed.
This.
The more so since at least one of the posts made in August refer to him as predominantly a LB.
Also liked his pre-match ritual of 30 seconds (yes, really - that long) meditation. The kid has some flair.
I think once the boy is Premier League ready we will get a full minute of meditation, already a legend in my book. #jesuschristsuperstar
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
Didnt do much f good though did it?
I thought he was gash for the first 15 mins, but was reasonably solid thereafter. I'll put it this way: I'm less worried that he might have been a waste of money than I am about Izquierdo. Early days for both, of course, but izquierdo did nothing except show (and this too rarely) that he has speed. He definitely didn't get much of the ball, so that doesn't help!
Unlike you.......
Krul is good, but Ryan has been ok lately and could do nothing about either goal last Friday.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How on earth can you say that so definitively?
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
Hughton says he delighted with the loss
LowKarate
New member
Totally agree. I thought he wasn't fit or interested for the first 15 and the errors were totting up and then something clicked and he got into the game and "put in 110% Brian". Competitive and skilful.
Krul has made a solid case for first team too.
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
No. He was delighted with the performance but disappointed with the loss.Hughton says he delighted with the loss
Blues Rock DJ
New member
not on Sunday,unfortunately !!
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Not definitively, but my opinion, of course. Krul made two very fine saves, which I applauded. I am biased because I am a Krul fan.
He had a very good game, but I'm not sure I could ever say that another 'keeper would have saved more or less.
Ninja Elephant
Doctor Elephant
- Feb 16, 2009
- 18,855
Whilst that is fair, I refer the honorable gentleman back to the 08/09 season. When the ghost or John Sullivan played, we were shipping in 3s and 4s per game. When the King returned, we stopped leaking goals. Is it a coincidence? Maybe. Or maybe the guy who came in is a better goalkeeper than the other two were.
For me, based on what we've seen so far, Ryan is perfectly adequate. But Krul has been a top goalkeeper for years, there's no doubt in my mind whatsoever that Tim Krul is the best goalkeeper at the club and he should be playing because of it. The only question marks are around his fitness, but judging from the highlights last night (which were almost exclusively him making saves) - he looks fit and firing to me.
I'm not anti-Ryan, I just think Krul is better.
Can't dispute any of that, but I can not ever accept that with Ryan in goal we would have been two down last night. With Ryan in goal we may have taken the game to penalties. Nobody knows.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,287
I do. It would have been a 2-1 victory if Ryan was in goal as his distribution would have lead to 2 goals, both scored by Murphy. End of.
MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,723
Is this true?