Nixonator
Well-known member
No i'm not. Said the same about Akpom and similarly got shot down as I will here, despite undoubtedly watching him play far more than anybody doing the shooting.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Izzy Brown
- Thread starter The Brighton Buzz
- Start date
No i'm not. Said the same about Akpom and similarly got shot down as I will here, despite undoubtedly watching him play far more than anybody doing the shooting.
Marshy
Well-known member
give me loftus -cheek thanks if we are going to loan a chelsea player.
As he's 20 he'll be a squad 'freebie', that's got to account for something.
Nixonator
Well-known member
And will be paying him Chelsea wages for his troubles. Do you think Chelsea are not going to want 100% of his new contract for a potential loan deal?
Probably be on as much as Knocky and Stephens.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
- Oct 4, 2003
- 11,031
There is no limit to the number of players a club can loan out, the 2 player loan rules apply to the club they are moving too (and only applies to domestic loans, loans from overseas clubs are considered full transfers and there is currently no limit).
Whoislloydy
Well-known member
I was referring to Hudds having 2 players on loan. I realise i couldn't structured that sentence better.
EDIT: Could've
****, serves me right for forgetting my glasses today.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
- Oct 4, 2003
- 11,031
Huddersfield only have 1 player on loan that counts to the rules being Kasey Palmer from Chelsea (they can still sign one more play on loan from any PL club other than Chelsea). Jonas Lossl is an overseas loan so doesn't count towards any quota.
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
Genuine question. What have people seen of RLC that always makes them suggest him?
He's played 22 times since 2014 and I believe (based on some quick maths) 66 minutes in the prem last season. He hasn't gone out on loan.
So what have people been watching that I've missed?
Nixonator
Well-known member
They haven't watched anything. They are deducing that he is a fantastic player because Chelsea themselves regard him higher and/or further along in development than the many other youth players they sent out on loan in and around his position/s.
Still, it's better than Brown because there's still hope he MIGHT be quality. We already know what we're getting with Brown.
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ
Hove / Παρος
Signed him on loan in Championship Manager 2016 and he scored hatfuls as we stormed the Championship. 
StonehamPark
#Brighton-Nil
'Sake. 
Personally I'm gutted that we won't be able to sign him. Hudds would have ideally taken Palmer and Brown but Chelsea don't want to sell either, so current premier league loans rules mean we can only take 1 Chelsea player on loan. Rightly or wrongly we've prioritised Palmer but there's not much in it, personally I'd have signed Brown first as he offers a more direct goal threat. I'm sure he'll do well for you guys.
Not sure why some have compared his goal output to Tammy Abraham, he's not a striker!
Not sure why some have compared his goal output to Tammy Abraham, he's not a striker!
I didn't realise you were privy to the intricacies of Chelsea contracts and Albion loan deal negotiations.
Nixonator
Well-known member
Now you know better.
I know fook all, other than the lad is 20 so won't cost a precious squad place.
I couldn't even pick him out of an identity parade if the fella next to him was wearing an 'I'm with Izzy Brown' finger pointing t-shirt.