Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Transfer Spending Policy

Do the club continue with sensible value for money spending or break the bank?


  • Total voters
    114






nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
17,610
Gods country fortnightly
Spending the most money doesn't guarantee success, as evidenced by last season. I think the club do get value for money, the majority of the time, so let it continue.

Indeed, our squad needs a couple of additions but we don't need to go mad
 


Silverhatch

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2009
4,315
Preston Park
Want us to spend very wisely - but intuitively feel we'll have to go big on a striker (and convince the rest of the squad that the player is worth it). Lucas Perez @ Arsenal keeps cropping up in my head.
 


seagull_special

Well-known member
Jun 9, 2008
2,931
Abu Dhabi
There is value out there but no way in the world should we solely focus on bargains, we will have to pay market value in an overheated market and finding that elusive striker/s will cost.
 


Big G

New member
Dec 14, 2005
1,086
Brighton
More than happy to keep the same policy. Why change from getting in committed team players who are prepared to play and give 100% and do not demand more money than they're actual worth and start bringing in up their own arse mercenaries who don't give a shit and ruin the team spirit with some poisonous attitude.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
64,057
Withdean area
There is value out there but no way in the world should we solely focus on bargains, we will have to pay market value in an overheated market and finding that elusive striker/s will cost.

:thumbsup:

The brutal reality of the PL means that heavy and expensive investment in players is the only way to have any chance of survival.
 




sjamesb3466

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2009
5,182
Leicester
Sensible spending but would be willing to go a little mad for a quality striker. Don't know if the club are just playing the position down by not really mentioning it but if we don't sign a top quality striker I would put my mortgage on us going down.
 




Perkino

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2009
5,987
The biggest problem is the wages. Signing players on contracts of more than £20k could backfire if we don't survive.

We need the right sort of players for a decent wage and maybe that will mean spending slightly more on a transfer fee but since CH arrived we've improved our squad with most of our signings without paying too much.

If you look at those we have recruited recently we've found plenty of bargains. Kayal, Goldson, Hemed, Murphy, Sidwell, Rosenior & Bong each purchased for less than £1m. Add to that Uwe, Duffy, Skalak, Norwood, Knockaert & Murray. There are plenty of bargains available
 


sir albion

New member
Jan 6, 2007
13,055
SWINDON
The biggest problem is the wages. Signing players on contracts of more than £20k could backfire if we don't survive.

We need the right sort of players for a decent wage and maybe that will mean spending slightly more on a transfer fee but since CH arrived we've improved our squad with most of our signings without paying too much.

If you look at those we have recruited recently we've found plenty of bargains. Kayal, Goldson, Hemed, Murphy, Sidwell, Rosenior & Bong each purchased for less than £1m. Add to that Uwe, Duffy, Skalak, Norwood, Knockaert & Murray. There are plenty of bargains available
I'd say Norwood and skalak were poor investments and both need shipping out asap :)
 


BUTTERBALL

East Stand Brighton Boyz
Jul 31, 2003
10,255
location location
Players need not only to provide VFM but also fit in with the incredibly close dynamic of the existing squad. Patience will pay dividends, panic buying simply doesn't work.
 




sussex_guy2k2

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2014
3,742
There's an argument to be made for keeping spending lower on transfer fees and spending more on wages. Teams like WBA have stayed up with exactly that philosophy.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here