No, I criticised them in the thread at the time, so this isn't with hindsight. I did so because the experts at our club (like Hughton) thought it was the right move, and I trust their judgement, and I criticise those that don't. Feel free to look it up.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Tomori is outstanding
- Thread starter Raleigh Chopper
- Start date
larus
Well-known member
Sew sorry.
GT49er
Well-known member
Know problem!
SweatyMexican
Well-known member
- Mar 31, 2013
- 4,101
Nah, he's already signed a contract with us next year, he was spotted at the Grand hotel last night.
Yeh I saw him too and his horses were grazing on the front lawn
royceyboy
On the 'ead son!
I really like the lad. He was absolutely solid after the bad start against Lincoln. I doubt he would cost more that 4 million, but he isn't going to leaving his parent club, but might be sent out on loan again.
Stumpy Tim
Well-known member
Cracking player, but if we're only allowed 2 loans he would be a waste. Central defence is an area we're well stocked. Would love it if we bought him, but not a loan
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Lurchy
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2014
- 2,351
Dominic Solanke - a team mate of Tomori's at both Chelsea and England U-20's wouldn't be a bad acquisition either, his contract is up at Chelsea and they would be due a development fee if he went to a English club. As he's currently being eyed up by RB Leipzig and Celtic, they might be open to a cheeky offer rather than potentially lose him for nothing
Lush
Mods' Pet
Never going to happen. Chelsea wouldn't have offered him a 4 year contract last year if they didn't see him as a future first team player for them IMO
samtheseagull
Well-known member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 1,599
I was not one of the ones saying he was rubbish BTW
They would, just so they can get more money. Loftus Cheek was one of their most hyped young players in years but it looks as though he may be sold this summer.
Bwian
Kiss my (_!_)
- Jul 14, 2003
- 15,898
Is this now a game of throwns?
origigull
Well-known member
- Jun 29, 2009
- 1,167
I was told that the PL clubs are only allowed 2 loans in the 25-man squad. If so then we have to be careful who we chose as loan players in case we need 1 in January.
GT49er
Well-known member
Well, if he's one of our two, that'd be fine by me. Agree it would be even better if we could buy him, though.
Washie
Well-known member
As he is under 21, would he still need to be part of the 25?
I dont no wot its cauld but I likes it
Bwian
Kiss my (_!_)
- Jul 14, 2003
- 15,898
Ewe shud be throne of ear wiv Inglish like vat.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
- Oct 4, 2003
- 11,070
Whoever told you that is wrong, Hull for example have 6 players in their squad on loan.
Stumpy Tim
Well-known member
Isn't it 2 from Premier League clubs, but you're allowed more from outside the Premier League?
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
- Oct 4, 2003
- 11,070
That could be the case as Hull have one from Liverpool, 1 from Everton and 4 players from outside the Premier League.
Edit - from the FA Standardised Rules 2016-17 it says the following
About as clear as mud (not unexpected from a document that also mentions short term loans which no longer exist) it could mean no more than 2 players at one time between 2 clubs, so we could get Tomori and Abraham but not a third on loan from Chelsea.
Last edited: