Sussex v South Africa - Hove May 19

Horton's halftime iceberg

Blooming Marvellous

Jan 9, 2005

16,484

Brighton

• May 19, 2017

• #21

SUSSEX XI: Nash (c), Wells, Finch, van Zyl, Rawlins, Salt, Burgess (wkt), Briggs, Shahzad, Garton, Sakande


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Horton's halftime iceberg

Blooming Marvellous

Jan 9, 2005

16,484

Brighton

• May 19, 2017

• #22

SOUTH AFRICA Parnell, De Kock, Duminy (c), Miller, Behardien, Pretorius, Phehlukwayo, Maharaj, Rabada, Morkel, Amla


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,065

West Sussex

• May 19, 2017

• #23

de Kock spraying it around to all parts... 17* (11 balls, 2 sixes)
Parnell 19* (19 balls, 3 fours)

SA 38-0 (5 overs)

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,065

West Sussex

• May 19, 2017

• #24

SA 50-0 (6 overs of 32)

 

jakarta

Well-known member

May 25, 2007

15,621

Sullington

• May 19, 2017

• #25

50-0 off 6 overs - a glorified net

 

Moshe Gariani

Well-known member

Mar 10, 2005

12,071

• May 19, 2017

• #26

Barry Izbak said:

Game on

See you down there

Click to expand...

Enjoy. Wish I was there - Friday evening at a sunny Eaton Road is close to heaven.

 

P

Petee

Well-known member

Nov 22, 2010

3,031

Brighton

• May 19, 2017

• #27

Prediction of 300+

 

Moshe Gariani

Well-known member

Mar 10, 2005

12,071

• May 19, 2017

• #28

Would Sussex become favourites to win this match if they had unlimited overs to chase whatever South Africa can get off 32 ...?

 

vegster

Sanity Clause

May 5, 2008

27,892

• May 19, 2017

• #29

Gentlemen, we have our wicket, Saffers 115-1 off 16 overs

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,065

West Sussex

• May 19, 2017

• #30

Petee said:

Prediction of 300+

Click to expand...

in 32 overs... that would be a stiff target for the Sussex batters.

 

Horton's halftime iceberg

Blooming Marvellous

Jan 9, 2005

16,484

Brighton

• May 19, 2017

• #31

Moshe Gariani said:

Would Sussex become favourites to win this match if they had unlimited overs to chase whatever South Africa can get off 32 ...?

Click to expand...

I love Sussex but even with that handicap I would have to punt on SA


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,065

West Sussex

• May 19, 2017

• #32

de Kock out (retired for 104*)... 223-2 (27 overs)... 5 to go...

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,065

West Sussex

• May 19, 2017

• #33

35 off the last 3 overs... Duminy caning it 62* (44 balls, 4 fours, 3 sixes)

258-2 with 2 to go.

 

Horton's halftime iceberg

Blooming Marvellous

Jan 9, 2005

16,484

Brighton

• May 19, 2017

• #34

290 to win in 32 overs will be get close


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

jakarta

Well-known member

May 25, 2007

15,621

Sullington

• May 19, 2017

• #35

Well that wasn't very good was it?

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,065

West Sussex

• May 19, 2017

• #36

Titanic said:

35 off the last 3 overs... Duminy caning it 62* (44 balls, 4 fours, 3 sixes)

258-2 with 2 to go.

Click to expand...

31 off the last 2... 289-4 (32 overs)

#timeforsomeprodding

 

Horton's halftime iceberg

Blooming Marvellous

Jan 9, 2005

16,484

Brighton

• May 19, 2017

• #37

Hmm only lost 2 wickets in our first over


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Pevenseagull

Anti-greed coalition

Jul 20, 2003

19,610

• May 19, 2017

• #38

Saving the cost of putting the floodlights on?

 

jakarta

Well-known member

May 25, 2007

15,621

Sullington

• May 19, 2017

• #39

Well it just confirms where we are in the pecking order I suppose...

 

Barry Izbak

U.T.A.

Dec 7, 2005

7,323

Lancing By Sea

• May 19, 2017

• Thread starter
• #40

The catch for the third Sussex wicket is the best I've ever seen live, and possibly the very best I've ever seen anywhere