Trump

Klaas · Oct 24, 2019

bhafc99 said:
Absolutely this.

This thread used to be worth visiting. Now it’s just become the Tyrone Biggums show. You could post a picture of, say, a giraffe on here, and he’d point blank deny it was a giraffe and then go into endless aggressive pointless whatabouterism.

Specifically, he would ask, 'What did you lot care about Obama and Clinton's giraffes? They would take dumps where ever they liked and they'd eat up all the best leaves. But you beta males just get your news spoonfed to you by the lame stream media.'

Frutos · Oct 24, 2019

...

Tyrone Biggums · Oct 24, 2019

Klaas said:
Pretty much. Self 'educated' on the internet with the self-assurance that anonymity provides. One way TB and Looney types prosper is that normal people just give up debating with them because they've got better things to do with their time. I think they take this as some kind of victory.

I mean look at the state of this comment...

You're not normal. What gives you the impression you are?

Like ANYONE on this site really gives a flying **** about Hilary Clinton, particularly 3 years AFTER she was relevant to global news. Apart from TB of course. Deluded.

Of course you don't give a ****. You've got no idea what's going but just want to circle jerk in your little echo chamber, correct?

Even though it's all tied into Trump and how the dickhead got into power.

bhafc99 · Oct 24, 2019

Frutos said:
...

FAKE GIRAFFE BAD! Another SHAM leaf hunt by those eat-everything LYIN' RHINOS. This is the MOST PURSEECUTED sandcastle since what BAD where is THE SERVER!

Klaas · Oct 24, 2019

Tyrone Biggums said:
You've got no idea what's going but just want to circle jerk in your little echo chamber, correct?

Thanks for confirming how spot on I was :lol:

beorhthelm · Oct 24, 2019

Tyrone Biggums said:
Even though it's all tied into Trump and how the dickhead got into power.

are you referring to he and supporters kept banging on about email servers, which recent investigations found she had not breached rules? he probably won the election on this persistent lie.

Blue Valkyrie · Oct 24, 2019

One of many more gems from President SuperVillain

[tweet]1187009187882176514[/tweet]

Tyrone Biggums · Oct 24, 2019

Blue Valkyrie said:
From a while back, Putin's information warfare machine is already in action :

https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1091758745284198402?s=19

Did you look into the history of the Washington Post attacking progressive Democrats?

They went after Bernie with the same bullshit.

I mean WikiLeaks exposed their involvement with the HC DNC team.

Tyrone Biggums · Oct 24, 2019

beorhthelm said:
are you referring to he and supporters kept banging on about email servers, which recent investigations found she had not breached rules? he probably won the election on this persistent lie.

I'm referring to WikiLeaks and what it showed.

According to an email from Marissa Astor, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook’s assistant, to Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, the campaign knew Trump was going to run, and pushed his legitimacy as a candidate. WikiLeaks’ release shows that it was seen as in Clinton’s best interest to run against Trump in the general election.

They deliberately contributed to the clown getting far more air time and exposure than he should have by going after him.

Mo Gosfield · Oct 24, 2019

beorhthelm said:
are you referring to he and supporters kept banging on about email servers, which recent investigations found she had not breached rules? he probably won the election on this persistent lie.

No he didn't.
He won the election because a lot of people wanted a change. It didn't matter what the change was, they just wanted to kick the US political establishment where the sun don't shine. It was supposed to be a shoe-in for Hilary. Trump was derided and treated as a joke by the majority of the media and celebrity ' luvvies ' It was the arrogance of too many that rubbed people up the wrong way and the thought of another Clinton, after two Bushes and the fake Obama, was too much for many. The people decided that they weren't going to allow their politics to continue to get more cosy, more predictable and most importantly more corrupt.
They knew Trump would be a shock to the system but also knew, that as a powerful businessman, he stood a chance of actually getting things done. Putting the interests of US citizens first and sorting the economy out, for starters.
Some people are obsessed with the idea that elections/referendums are won/lost on the basis of specific mistruths ( Email servers/Buses etc ) This is to satisfy themselves that the opposition only won because they deceived the electorate and didn't play fair. Well, there is nothing fair in politics. It is an environment that spends its time peddling half-truths, lies and propaganda, to suit its own agenda. It relies on apathy and disinterest. It puts out manifesto's and then promptly ignores everything in them. It keeps sending out a message, then changes direction and blames lack of co-operation from others.
The US election and our referendum were pivotal moments in history, when a lot of people suddenly decided that the establishment had had their own way for too long, the status quo had to change and they wanted to shake things up. They did.

vegster · Oct 24, 2019

I'm finding it increasingly strange how anyone can defend the indefensible time after time, be it Trump or Brexit. Both of which have been exposed time after time as being either a moron or moronic. Trump will hang himself by his actions and words, the only question is the timing.

vegster · Oct 24, 2019

Mo Gosfield said:
No he didn't.
He won the election because a lot of people wanted a change. It didn't matter what the change was, they just wanted to kick the US political establishment where the sun don't shine. It was supposed to be a shoe-in for Hilary. Trump was derided and treated as a joke by the majority of the media and celebrity ' luvvies ' It was the arrogance of too many that rubbed people up the wrong way and the thought of another Clinton, after two Bushes and the fake Obama, was too much for many. The people decided that they weren't going to allow their politics to continue to get more cosy, more predictable and most importantly more corrupt.
They knew Trump would be a shock to the system but also knew, that as a powerful businessman, he stood a chance of actually getting things done. Putting the interests of US citizens first and sorting the economy out, for starters.
Some people are obsessed with the idea that elections/referendums are won/lost on the basis of specific mistruths ( Email servers/Buses etc ) This is to satisfy themselves that the opposition only won because they deceived the electorate and didn't play fair. Well, there is nothing fair in politics. It is an environment that spends its time peddling half-truths, lies and propaganda, to suit its own agenda. It relies on apathy and disinterest. It puts out manifesto's and then promptly ignores everything in them. It keeps sending out a message, then changes direction and blames lack of co-operation from others.
The US election and our referendum were pivotal moments in history, when a lot of people suddenly decided that the establishment had had their own way for too long, the status quo had to change and they wanted to shake things up. They did.

That part hasn't gone so well now has it ?

LamieRobertson · Oct 24, 2019

vegster said:
That part hasn't gone so well now has it ?

Although I reckon one poster would argue it has

Motogull · Oct 24, 2019

vegster said:
I'm finding it increasingly strange how anyone can defend the indefensible time after time, be it Trump or Brexit. Both of which have been exposed time after time as being either a moron or moronic. Trump will hang himself by his actions and words, the only question is the timing.

Yeah, but whatabout Hilary's emails?

Greg Bobkin · Oct 24, 2019

Motogull said:
Yeah, but whatabout Hilary's emails?

And the Bidens.
And Obama and his birth certificate.
And Bill Clinton.
And James Comey.
And Robert Mueller.
And the two FBI people who were having an affair (or something).
And and and...

:lol:

Nitram · Oct 24, 2019

Mo Gosfield said:
No he didn't.
He won the election because a lot of people wanted a change. It didn't matter what the change was, they just wanted to kick the US political establishment where the sun don't shine. It was supposed to be a shoe-in for Hilary. Trump was derided and treated as a joke by the majority of the media and celebrity ' luvvies ' It was the arrogance of too many that rubbed people up the wrong way and the thought of another Clinton, after two Bushes and the fake Obama, was too much for many. The people decided that they weren't going to allow their politics to continue to get more cosy, more predictable and most importantly more corrupt.
They knew Trump would be a shock to the system but also knew, that as a powerful businessman, he stood a chance of actually getting things done. Putting the interests of US citizens first and sorting the economy out, for starters.
Some people are obsessed with the idea that elections/referendums are won/lost on the basis of specific mistruths ( Email servers/Buses etc ) This is to satisfy themselves that the opposition only won because they deceived the electorate and didn't play fair. Well, there is nothing fair in politics. It is an environment that spends its time peddling half-truths, lies and propaganda, to suit its own agenda. It relies on apathy and disinterest. It puts out manifesto's and then promptly ignores everything in them. It keeps sending out a message, then changes direction and blames lack of co-operation from others.
The US election and our referendum were pivotal moments in history, when a lot of people suddenly decided that the establishment had had their own way for too long, the status quo had to change and they wanted to shake things up. They did.

All good con artists can spin an illusion, history shows dictators are great at leading the impressionable masses in this respect. Those invested in the illusion will try and fight harder to prove they were not wrong, as is happening now. History show that truth and impartiality lose to partisan politics in these circumstances.

Blue Valkyrie · Oct 24, 2019

Greg Bobkin said:
And the Bidens.
And Obama and his birth certificate.
And Bill Clinton.
And James Comey.
And Robert Mueller.
And the two FBI people who were having an affair (or something).
And and and...

[emoji38]

Ah Trump, Ukraine and the Bidens.

President SuperVillain liked a bit of a mobster shakedown as well.

https://twitter.com/PresVillain/status/1176897503138078722?s=19

Greg Bobkin · Oct 24, 2019

Blue Valkyrie said:
Ah Trump, Ukraine and the Bidens.

President SuperVillain liked a bit of a mobster shakedown as well.

https://twitter.com/PresVillain/status/1176897503138078722?s=19

Yes. The transcript from the 'perfect' phone call*. No-one can talk on the phone like him. No-one knows more about phones – or phone calls – than him. He has the best phones. Maybe that's why people call him 'phoney' :lol:

*Or 'letter' as Trumpo called it the other day :shrug:

Bakero · Oct 24, 2019

There's a Jill Stein opinion piece in the Guardian today-

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-asset-the-establishment-is-losing-their-grip

Like her attack on Tulsi Gabbard, Hillary Clinton’s accusation that I am a “Russian asset” is a ludicrous, unhinged conspiracy theory with no basis in fact. It’s also an attempt to deflect attention from the role of Clinton’s campaign in her own defeat. This desperate blame game is not an encouraging sign that the Democratic party will muster a winning strategy to oust the disastrous Trump administration in 2020.

Blue Valkyrie · Oct 24, 2019

Bakero said:
There's a Jill Stein opinion piece in the Guardian today-

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-asset-the-establishment-is-losing-their-grip

Like her attack on Tulsi Gabbard, Hillary Clinton’s accusation that I am a “Russian asset” is a ludicrous, unhinged conspiracy theory with no basis in fact. It’s also an attempt to deflect attention from the role of Clinton’s campaign in her own defeat. This desperate blame game is not an encouraging sign that the Democratic party will muster a winning strategy to oust the disastrous Trump administration in 2020.

Jill Stein would say that, wouldn't she ?

Maybe she rejected her first draft "I am a Russian asset, and I've been told by my Kremlin handler that Tulsi isn't one as well" :shrug:

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Trump

I've changed this

.

Well-known member

Well-known member

I've changed this

A. Virgo, Football Genius

Not seen such Bravery!

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Sanity Clause

Sanity Clause

Not awoke

Todd Warrior

Silver Seagull

Well-known member

Not seen such Bravery!

Silver Seagull

Languidly clinical

Not seen such Bravery!

Share this page