Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Trump
- Thread starter ShandyH
- Start date
But he'll also go down as the very best candidate offered to America by the Republican party, and that's even before getting into the Democratic parties clusterf**k.
That's an oxymoron or just means gay.
So, why don't you want transgender people who have no psychological issues in the military. Gay men, bisexuals, and lesbians are allowed to join the military. As you are (wrongly, as I know you are aware) referring to transgender people with no psychological issues as gay, then surely they are allowed to join the military in your book.
symyjym
Banned
I didn't say I didn't want transgender people in the military, I said it makes it too complicated. Do they supply 3 toilets or do they expect women to feel comfortable sharing facilities with someone who wants to be a woman this year. As I said it would lead to long drawn out court cases because someone or groups are not pc.
The army have got enough court cases over treatment, bullying, sexism and even death in training to worry about without chucking transgenders into the lions den.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
Ha ha.
US military have basically told Trumpski to wind his neck in.
That is, they've said nothing changes until they get further details of how to implement his tweet.
Guess they won't be nuking Korea if he declares war via twitter then.
US military have basically told Trumpski to wind his neck in.
That is, they've said nothing changes until they get further details of how to implement his tweet.
Guess they won't be nuking Korea if he declares war via twitter then.
Lyndhurst 14
Well-known member
- Jan 16, 2008
- 5,129
Trump is such a petty vindictive individual. If Obama had come up with a cure for cancer he would have repealed it out of spite
McTavish
Well-known member
- Nov 5, 2014
- 1,562
Men have much higher suicide rates than women, so by your argument we should not let men join the forces...
Anyone stupid enough to want to join up and go and fight one of the US's oil or profit wars should be allowed to join.
ObamaCare might not have taken such a battering if it was actually known as The Affordable Care Act.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
I beleive in evidence, none of that is evidence.
So what you are saying is that Trump, revilled as an ultra nationalist, is somehow a manchurian candidate under Russian Controll, due to Blackmail or some such thing. Julian assange and wikileaks are also in on it, somehow, and are lying about the leaks coming from a DNC staffer.
The facts that hillary had a private sevrerm which was acid washed and smashed up, as well as the fact the DNC did not turn their servers over to the FBI to be examined are irrelevant.
It is in no way a smoke screen to cover the fact the DNC lost an unlosable election? All this with no evidence what so ever.
The DNC are trying to use the mechanisms of state to harrass trump so unless you or anyone else can provide hard evidence, or any evidence I am entitled to beleive its a load of hogwash.
Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 6,585
Be honest with yourself, there is no evidence that anyone could provide that you would not dismiss.
Were Trump to turn up on your doorstep arm in arm with Putin in front of a backdrop of tv screens showing sound and vision recordings of his campaign team colluding, whilst occasionally turning to camera, winking and saying "You fell for it suckers" all under a banner signed by every one of them proclaiming "We did it!" in letters eight feet tall, you would log onto your computer and tell everyone on social media that none of it constituted a crime, Hilary Clinton had done worse anyway and that reality was a false construct of the mainstream media, proven as lies by Breitbart not reporting it.
McTavish
Well-known member
- Nov 5, 2014
- 1,562
OK - I'll bite. As a fan of evidence - what do you mean by "acid-washed" and what evidence do you have that this was done to Hillary's server?
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
drew
Drew
He can't because I believe even they acknowledge she used a free online programme to delete them. And noone has suggested the server was smashed up. Looney is essentially living up to his avatar, that or just a very poor wum!
The_Viper
Well-known member
It's about psychological normality (if there is such a thing, as we all have our own psychological conditions) or competence. If someone meets such criteria, then why should gender play a part? That's the argument against a ban. Although I don't think Trump has actually given his reasons, which is part of the problem of his presidency. He does things to disrupt, and his disruptive behaviour is never positive, but more to influence an unseen and unknown agenda.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The_Viper
Well-known member
I have no idea to be honest.
Talking of psychological problems, I think that Trump probably has lots.
I think there are days when he wakes up and he genuinely thinks that he wants to make America great; there are days when he probably passionately believes in world peace; at the right moment he might also believe in climate change and next week he might find himself wanting to champion gay rights.
I think Trump has a screwed up idea of what 'being loved' is. He wants to be loved, but at the same time he wants to play the status game and demand respect. He suffers from a schizophrenic view of the world.
All this means there is no coherent vision, there is only 'what's important to Donald right now.' That's why Twitter is his form of policy making.
What's the agenda? What's it like inside Donald's brain today, right now? That's the agenda.
My view.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
anyone notice the announcement of 1.6 billion towards the border wall with Mexico?
strange that - it's almost as if the news was too busy dealing with another controversial Trump tweet. Next time Trump tweets something deliberately provocative it's worth looking around to what's being passed in the background. Were it not for the media falling over themselves they might have picked this up a bit more.
If the left media were to focus on this sort of thing it would really cause Trump problems.
strange that - it's almost as if the news was too busy dealing with another controversial Trump tweet. Next time Trump tweets something deliberately provocative it's worth looking around to what's being passed in the background. Were it not for the media falling over themselves they might have picked this up a bit more.
If the left media were to focus on this sort of thing it would really cause Trump problems.