- Aug 7, 2003
- 7,792
Costed by Dianne Abbott twelvety times.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
General Election 2017
- Thread starter Giraffe
- Start date
Costed by Dianne Abbott twelvety times.
"The newspapers". Does that generalisation include the Mirror, Independent and Guardian?
The Mirror hasn't been overly favourable either. The Guardian I find a more balanced view.
Gregory2Smith1
J'les aurai!
lots of noddys standing around wearing rosettes
mostly detatched from reality
not much changed there then
mostly detatched from reality
not much changed there then
Kosh
'The' Yaztromo
It's not personal.
I''m just utterly, utterly jaded.
They are all liars, and frankly very odd people.
I just think the time has come for a new kind of democracy. What that is, I do not know. But the past 60 years or so... we'll it hasn't really worked... swing ball politics, and you know what? I feel like the poor ball on a string, battered, bruised and left crying in the old drafty shed for year upon miserable year, until my string deteriorates, frays and I fall to the floor under that old patio seat... forgotten and utterly powerless as the shed rots around me.
Democracy: it just doesn't do what it says on the ****ing tin.
Give me the temple of Mithras.
Last edited:
I have only seen Labour banners on peoples houses while delivering in Worthing, including one lady telling me not to vote Tory while delivering a parcel.
Don't think Worthing has ever not been a conservative seat in my lifetime, so proportional representation might be a good thing, even though it was out voted last time, it hasn't stopped Scotland wanting another vote.
Don't think Worthing has ever not been a conservative seat in my lifetime, so proportional representation might be a good thing, even though it was out voted last time, it hasn't stopped Scotland wanting another vote.
Awesome
nickbrighton
Well-known member
- Feb 19, 2016
- 1,918
ah I see the difference, yours is a better definition of what I meant, torys, lib dems and the right side of the labour movement (if that's not a contradiction!)
JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
Social media is over-represented by tedious immature virtue signalling bell ends .. the first respondent to your post being a prime example.
nickbrighton
Well-known member
- Feb 19, 2016
- 1,918
I didn't say that was the reason I would or wouldn't vote for them. I just said that in order for Labour to win that's what they need to do.,. They have produced their manifesto and said we can do this, and here's how we pay for it. BUT if you do cost something, and say we can do all this for this many £s, and this is where its coming from then its disingenuous to just leave out half the costs because they either don't know how much its going to be, or, they do, and if they publish that, it will show the sums don't add up.
I wont vote for them because I disagree with a fair chunk of what they say they want to do, and the fact that they still cant decide among themselves if they will or wont defend the country
Albumen
Don't wait for me!
Conservatives are lifting the ban on the ivory trade May's mate is the President of antiques or some shit. As if they couldn't get any more ****ish.
It's the noisy minority.
The quiet majority will not be voting hard left, despite the noise from the likes of Charlotte Church, RagNBone Man, Russell Brand and other usual suspects arrogantly assuming that their fame will switch voters. If anything, it's a turn off.
Too 2017. Go retro with a 1917 Leninist hat:
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2015/dec/14/jeremy-corbyn-hat-buy-of-the-day
It's the accessory for every metro man.
Iggle Piggle
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2010
- 5,318
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
Even Dianne Abbott couldn't make your IQ more than a SINGLE figure number
Lenny Rider
Well-known member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 5,425
JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
