Hastings gull
Well-known member
- Nov 23, 2013
- 4,635
Yes, Trident has really got him. Utterly unconvincing. He would not get in first - so build some cellars everyone, as he would get in second, if anyone is still alive by then of course.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
General Election 2017
- Thread starter Giraffe
- Start date
Yes, Trident has really got him. Utterly unconvincing. He would not get in first - so build some cellars everyone, as he would get in second, if anyone is still alive by then of course.
Ron Manager
Oooh, wasn't it?
We're doomed, North Korea will threaten to bomb and Jeremy wants to talk over Lattes and croissants.
Mellor 3 Ward 4
Well-known member
Now dodging the question on immigration.
midnight_rendezvous
Well-known member
You realise bombs today are far more powerful than in 1945?
jonny.rainbow
Well-known member
- Oct 29, 2005
- 6,607
Not really.
Only so many ways you can explain to people that if a nuclear weapon is fired then it is bad for everybody.
Butch Willykins
Well-known member
Good god he's waffling
studio150
Well-known member
Probably because only 1 side had nuclear weapons, now it really is MAD
carteater
Well-known member
Seems the bbc have bought in a more right wing audience now.
Under pressure from the right wing media
Under pressure from the right wing media
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
They won't be fired if aggressors believe we will use them to defend ourselves. If we disarm or are not
prepared to use them then we will put ourselves in danger. JC's non reaction to this point being made to him just then was unbelievable. He has just alienated many traditional Labour voters.
lawros left foot
Glory hunting since 1969
Only one side had them , they were tiny compared to the modern bombs, there were only two bombs used, Japan could not retaliate.
Not sure why him not wanting to start a nuclear war is bad...
Bob'n'weave
Well-known member
GT49er
Well-known member
Not at all. It's a free country. You can feel whatever you like.
................Except perhaps superiority.............
vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 27,894
Indeed, If we fire ours it's only because we are going to die in 2 minutes.....if we use them we have already lost.
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
He said he would use them and if it was in such a situation that needed a nuclear weapon fired we would all be in the shit
A bit yes, but not as much as letting this apologist, populist and TRAITOR anywhere near our national security decisions.
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
It's about whether he would protect us from a nuclear threat not about whether he wants to start a nuclear war.
jonny.rainbow
Well-known member
- Oct 29, 2005
- 6,607
Tory boy can't afford to pay staff in his business if he has to pay a living wage.
Don't employ people if you can't afford to.
Don't employ people if you can't afford to.
vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 27,894
She's trying to mop up the UKIP vote.
That's an absurd thing to say.
In WW2 only the US had them so none could be used in retaliation. That's even before we consider how many there are in the world now and the massively increased yield over early weapons.