Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Great game Tomori
- Thread starter Mental Lental
- Start date
Seasider78
Well-known member
- Nov 14, 2004
- 5,937
Can't fault the lad has come in and performed admirably in 2 unnatural positions and is clearly still learning. Can see the quality he has in glimpses and has a bright future ahead of him
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rocker959
Well-known member
Same from me .
Shropshire Seagull
Well-known member
Since you rightly point out this is a democracy, it is my right to "tell you otherwise" [as others have already done too]
To have "cost us two points" means converting a win into a draw. I cannot see where this view comes from since, at no point were we winning, very few were calling it an "expected win", and at no point IMHO did we actually look like winning it. So 3 points was never really in our grasp.
Since the final result was not a draw, the only correct statement is that we either lost 3 points if you think we should have won or 1 point if you think we should have drawn. Cost 2 points is just a stupid comment ....
The Birdman
New member
Good in the air has pace just needs time on the field.
Hillian1
( . ) ( . )
Apart from the rash tackle I thought he was pretty decent, you could see AK keep looking for him to make a run but f you try to compare him against Bruno the lad doesn't stand a chance.
He came inside towards the end, but in the main was out wide, that is why Leeds offered little from their left side as they were worried about Knockaert
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk