might be as likely to challenge that trio-opoly as Reading.No I'm not forgetting them.. the question doesn't include them, and we have no influence over their points tally from here on in. Therefore, to stay in the top 2 I would rather knock a potential challenger to that position further back makes perfect sense. Of course I don't want to choose one over the other, I want both, but that isn't the question we've been asked to consider. If the upcoming games were Newcastle and Huddersfield, then I would want to beat Huddersfield more than Newcastle.. not sure its that different..I just don't get this, because you're forgetting Huddersfield, who really do look like a problem. They've got more points than Reading, and have a game in hand over them and, as we discovered to our cost, are in cracking form. Us and Hudds also have the easier run-ins, compared to both Newcastle and Reading. It's not about safe second versus risky first, at all. For a long time I and many others thought Newcastle would run away with. That time has long gone. It's most likely to be a three-horse race, and I suspect that
I just don't get this, because you're forgetting Huddersfield, who really do look like a problem. They've got more points than Reading, and have a game in hand over them and, as we discovered to our cost, are in cracking form. Us and Hudds also have the easier run-ins, compared to both Newcastle and Reading. It's not about safe second versus risky first, at all. For a long time I and many others thought Newcastle would run away with. That time has long gone. It's most likely to be a three-horse race, and I suspect that
I find the poll options unacceptable.
