StonehamPark
#Brighton-Nil
North America (inc. Mexico) to host.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
More than one nation to host the World Cup.
- Thread starter Leekbrookgull
- Start date
- Aug 8, 2005
- 26,544
Is this because they have decided to invite the whole world to the finals so they need more stadiums and they realise the shithole countries that keep giving them to don't have enough?
In theory not a bad idea, but needs to be neighbouring countries surely.
In theory not a bad idea, but needs to be neighbouring countries surely.
turienzo's lovechild
New member
- Oct 25, 2003
- 23,964
scotland, wales, ireland (and northern ireland?) would host a decent tournament but then you have the problem of having 3, maybe 4, really average teams qualifying automatically and being the top seeds in their group.
USA could host solo so I don't see much value in them hosting it with someone else, and Mexico have hosted it twice so they can do one. Maybe two South American nations like Chile and Argentina? Australia/New Zealand? Spain/Portugal? I don't think there's actually that many combos
USA could host solo so I don't see much value in them hosting it with someone else, and Mexico have hosted it twice so they can do one. Maybe two South American nations like Chile and Argentina? Australia/New Zealand? Spain/Portugal? I don't think there's actually that many combos
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 30,566
FIFA would hold it in the Antarctic if the penguins could come up with the cash.
Think there's a freeze on the economy at the moment.
That is one country.So Fifa president Gianni Infantino likes the idea of more than one country hosting the world cup ? So come on the FA,s of England,Northern Ireland,Scotland and Wales give it a go.