Never seen such a mob of bad losers

edna krabappel · Jan 20, 2017

The_Viper said:
Where on earth did you get those numbers from? The highest estimate I've seen is 200,00 and that is because that is how many people have said they're going on Facebook

Yeah, it'll be like one of those house parties that teenagers advertise on Facebook though....send invites to fifty and then six hundred turn up and send the neighbours into an outraged frenzy, documented by the appearance of very angry faces in the local newspaper

Simster · Jan 20, 2017

Well I'll just say that I remain flabbergasted that the USA - an enormously wealthy country with a population of 318,900,000 - couldn't do better than to narrow it's final choice down to either Donald Trump or Hilary Clinton.

What a remarkably crap choice.

Peteinblack · Jan 20, 2017

Tyrone Biggums said:
No they wouldn't have protested. They don't sook like Liberals.

The vast majority of violent protests in the US is by the Democrats supporters in their various guises.

True story.

Republicans have spent 8 years questioning Obama's nationality ('Show us your Birth certificate'), to imply he wasn't American enough to be President. They never 'got over it' or 'moved on'!

Now they expect everyone immediately to accept that they won, and so shut-up without any complaints or questions.

The usual arrogance and hypocrisy of the Right - "Don't do as we do, do as we say."

Tyrone Biggums · Jan 20, 2017

The_Viper said:
Where on earth did you get those numbers from? The highest estimate I've seen is 200,00 and that is because that is how many people have said they're going on Facebook

There would have been more women at the march for women except they banned a bunch of women from taking part because they didn't like their views and opinions. &#55357;&#56836;

studio150 · Jan 20, 2017

The_Viper said:
Where on earth did you get those numbers from? The highest estimate I've seen is 200,00 and that is because that is how many people have said they're going on Facebook

A bit like the leavers rally when some posters were complaining no coverage by the BBC. When in fact only 6 turned up.

I think the more telling signs in DC is the empty stands on the way from the white house.

Nixonator · Jan 20, 2017

Peteinblack said:

Frutos · Jan 20, 2017

Simster said:
Well I'll just say that I remain flabbergasted that the USA - an enormously wealthy country with a population of 318,900,000 - couldn't do better than to narrow it's final choice down to either Donald Trump or Hilary Clinton.

What a remarkably crap choice.

Pretty much sums up my view.

If either is the best they can do, they're screwed anyway.

Coldeanseagull · Jan 20, 2017

don't really follow politics from a foreign land.......or ours come to think of it, but has he built the wall yet?

edna krabappel · Jan 20, 2017

Frutos said:
Pretty much sums up my view.

If either is the best they can do, they're screwed anyway.

Inclined to agree. When you consider how many apparent faux pas Trump made on his campaign, it was staggering that the Democrats seemed incapable of forging ahead. Surely they could have found a more engaging candidate from somewhere? I guess I should have been very pro-Hillary, being female & all that, but I just couldn't warm to her. I'd still have voted for her over Trump given the choice, but without any really strong feelings in her favour.

Tyrone Biggums · Jan 20, 2017

Peteinblack said:
Republicans have spent 8 years questioning Obama's nationality ('Show us your Birth certificate'), to imply he wasn't American enough to be President. They never' got over it' or 'moved on'!

Now they expect everyone immediately to accept that they won, and so shut-up without any complaints or questions.

The usual arrogance and hypocrisy of the Right - "Don't do as we do, do as we say."

And yet Republicans still turned up to his inauguration. And none of their members acted like the childish babies of the democrats have for the last two years.

Trump got in because of these liberal twats. They are just too thick and self absorbed to recognise that.

heathgate · Jan 20, 2017

Simster said:
Well I'll just say that I remain flabbergasted that the USA - an enormously wealthy country with a population of 318,900,000 - couldn't do better than to narrow it's final choice down to either Donald Trump or Hilary Clinton.

What a remarkably crap choice.

The fact that you say you are flabergasted at this turn of events in the US of A, really does in my view throw some doubt on your ability to make a cogent comment on anything political.

Simster · Jan 20, 2017

heathgate said:
The fact that you say you are flabergasted at this turn of events in the US of A, really does in my view throw some doubt on your ability to make a cogent comment on anything political.

Why does it do that? I mean obviously I understand how the process works such that you need a lot of money to stand, but the point I'm trying to make is that it doesn't put the nation in a particularly good light, IMO.

The_Viper · Jan 20, 2017

Tyrone Biggums said:
And yet Republicans still turned up to his inauguration. And none of their members acted like the childish babies of the democrats have for the last two years.

Trump got in because of these liberal twats. They are just too thick and self absorbed to recognise that.

Leekbrookgull · Jan 20, 2017

Tyrone Biggums said:
And yet Republicans still turned up to his inauguration. And none of their members acted like the childish babies of the democrats have for the last two years.

Trump got in because of these liberal twats. They are just too thick and self absorbed to recognise that.

Which is what Brexit was. For years the liberal elite sniggered and laughed at Farage 24/365 and like you say So Thick That They Gave Farage The Biggest Prize on Show.

vegster · Jan 20, 2017

Tyrone Biggums said:
No they wouldn't have protested. They don't sook like Liberals.

The vast majority of violent protests in the US is by the Democrats supporters in their various guises.

True story.

Awesome analysis, :facepalm:

sir albion · Jan 20, 2017

Socialist anarchists are a pointless idiotic bunch of buffoons....always geeky and can never be wrong naturally :thumbsup:

mothy · Jan 20, 2017

Plenty of idiots in London with their silly banners on a bridge. Is that the best they can do? Pathetic! Yep that'll effect real change..

Tyrone Biggums · Jan 20, 2017

vegster said:
Awesome analysis,

It's all laid bare on social media for all too see.

If people think Trumps social media condemns him then what is there for all too see of liberal USA absolutely buried them In this last election outside of the big echo chamber states of California and New York.

Two Professors · Jan 20, 2017

Sussex Nomad said:
There's a million people protesting on the streets of Washington tomorrow I believe.

Not if it's raining :lolol:

SAC · Jan 20, 2017

All along Trump said that he would not accept the result when he lost. I seem to remember that he even implied that someone would shoot Hillary.

For his supporters on here to cry when people are objecting against Trump is rather hypocritical.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Never seen such a mob of bad losers

Well-known member

"the man's an arse"

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

.

Opinionated

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

"the man's an arse"

Well-known member

Well-known member

Sanity Clause

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Two Mad Professors

Well-known member

Share this page