Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Swearing an oath to British values.









soistes

Well-known member
Sep 12, 2012
2,643
Brighton
Pathetic and stupid idea, with not a chance of having any impact other than hugely irritating lots of law-abiding, hard-working and sensible NHS workers, public officials, school governors and whatnot.

I'm British, and as far as I'm concerned a key British value is not having anything to do with swearing oaths of loyalty to British values.
 


Perfidious Albion

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2011
6,025
At the end of my tether
I cannot see it making any difference to the quality of work done by those involved. It just makes it easier for the employers to sack you if you break your oath..

If it were me, my attitude would depend on what the oath actually required me to say. Chances are, it would be so ambiguous that they could find a ready excuse to discipline you on a whim if somebody complained about something you did, they could say it broke the oath.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,506
West is BEST
I have no doubt if this ever came to pass there would be an opt out option. There would probably just be little Sanjit Patel alone every morning enthusiastically swearing his oath to The Raj while everyone else was outside having a fag and moaning about the weather.
 












nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
17,575
Gods country fortnightly
"Swearing an oath to British values."

It sound like something you'd do in your make believe gang with your friends when you are about six years old. Painful.

As soon as I hear this it brought back memories of Gripper Stepson on Grange Hill making Black kids swear allegiance to the British people
 


Tom Bombadil

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2003
6,032
Jibrovia
I find the very idea of swearing an oath to British values to be against British values. It's the sort of thing insecure Johnny Foreigner types get up to
 


Braggfan

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded
May 12, 2014
1,831
"impossible for people to play a “positive role” in public life unless they accepted basic values such as democracy and equality."

Is that the type of democracy and equality that has led us to end up with a prime minister who was neither elected and voted against gay marriage?
 




Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
Is that the type of democracy and equality that has led us to end up with a prime minister who was neither elected and voted against gay marriage?

a) We don't elect Prime Ministers, we elect MPs. The Tory Party as a whole won the 2015 election and so it really doesn't matter who they choose to lead the party in government. They don't need to call a general election every time there's a change in leadership. There's no degradation of democracy.

b) Theresa May voted in favour of civil partnerships in 2004 and in 2013 she voted in favour of gay marriage. According to Baroness Featherstone, who constructed the equal marriage law, her very vocal support was pivotal in ensuring that it went through.
 


Braggfan

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded
May 12, 2014
1,831
a) We don't elect Prime Ministers, we elect MPs. The Tory Party as a whole won the 2015 election and so it really doesn't matter who they choose to lead the party in government. They don't need to call a general election every time there's a change in leadership.

b) Theresa May voted in favour of civil partnerships in 2004 and in 2013 she voted in favour of gay marriage. According to Baroness Featherstone, who constructed the equal marriage law, her very vocal support was pivotal in ensuring that it went through.

I stand corrected on Theresa May's civil partnership votes, but she still has a chequered history on LGBT issues. She voted against repealing section 28 for example.

It's too simplistic to say we vote for MP's rather than PM's, especially given the current voting system. But we currently have a PM that not a single person outside her party members voted for to be leader, or voted for her party while she was leader. That doesn't sound very democratic.

But what it highlights is that the notion of British values are so ambiguous, how can we swear allegiance to them when we can't even agree on what constitutes democracy?
 


Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
I stand corrected on Theresa May's civil partnership votes, but she still has a chequered history on LGBT issues. She voted against repealing section 28 for example.

I agree but there's no doubting that Theresa May has wholeheartedly supported equality for the LGBT community for many years now. She's clearly seen the light.

It's too simplistic to say we vote for MP's rather than PM's, especially given the current voting system. But we currently have a PM that not a single person outside her party members voted for to be leader, or voted for her party while she was leader. That doesn't sound very democratic.

It's not simplistic to say that we vote for MPs given the current voting system - because it IS our current voting system - we vote for MPs, that's what we do. And the general public has never ever voted for who becomes party leader of any political party. That's the sole preserve of the party members.

So Theresa May became Tory leader and therefore PM mid-term. It doesn't change a thing. For a start, it's happened 6 times already since 1945 and that spans just 14 elections, 4 times for the Tories and twice for Labour and there has never ever been a general election called on the back of it. There simply isn't a need and it's extremely clear why - because we elect MPs. It's how our democracy works. Other countries have different democracies but ours is just as democratic.
 




essexeagle

Active member
Jul 22, 2004
474
Great idea but rarely has there been a more apt time for the quote 'after the horse has bolted'.

But let's get real. If you're stuck in a spot in your home country and you get the chance to 'earn' an income you could hardly begin to dream about by coming over 'ere and accepting the fortnightly Government handout, then I'm sure you would pledge allegiance to the bloody BHA fan club if you had to!

Well, maybe that's taking it too far but you get the gist.....They would do anything to get in so the whole thing is a waste of time
 




LlcoolJ

Mama said knock you out.
Oct 14, 2009
12,982
Sheffield
Rarely does an issue almost universally unite NSC. That's the one positive I can see from this ludicrous waste of time.
 


LlcoolJ

Mama said knock you out.
Oct 14, 2009
12,982
Sheffield
Should have been brought I years ago.......this is one thing the Americans have got right in respect of immigration, and we haven't. Sooner the PLP realises this, the sooner that disaffected Labour voters will come back in droves.
Oh.
 




spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
Great idea but rarely has there been a more apt time for the quote 'after the horse has bolted'.

But let's get real. If you're stuck in a spot in your home country and you get the chance to 'earn' an income you could hardly begin to dream about by coming over 'ere and accepting the fortnightly Government handout, then I'm sure you would pledge allegiance to the bloody BHA fan club if you had to!

Well, maybe that's taking it too far but you get the gist.....They would do anything to get in so the whole thing is a waste of time

How is it a great idea then?

In a period where the Government needs to be 100% on the ball to avoid us getting shafted in the forthcoming Brexit negotiations, that they choose to waste time on showy, meaningless, bullshit to try and placate what they think The Daily Express wants is insulting to all of us.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here