You've lost me.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
You've lost me.
Baker lite
Banned
Baker lite
Banned
I can’t breath [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji106][emoji2532]
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Usual response retorts to insults like the rest of the remain gang. None of them can put any point forward without an insult. Impossible to have a civilised argument
portslade seagull
Well-known member
So why has he left 4800 jobs. Please explain
portslade seagull
Well-known member
While I don't always agree, I can see the logic behind the likes of cunning fergus's arguments as they are based on ideology, not trying to argue we might be better off.
I understand people want to leave, and have reasons for that, but denying we are going to be worse off is like saying climate change isn't happening. It is a delusion.
This game of leaving is all about what is the 'least' painful, because all options are painful. I don't understand people trying to deny this.
Is that fact ? Or what you've heard
cunning fergus
Well-known member
- Jan 18, 2009
- 4,745
The trouble with you (and others like you) is that you accept the superficial tropes of right wing, left wing without having a grasp of what it means and how political ideology overlays the history of institutions like the EU.
I suspect you are young, and won’t know that the very original eurosceptics were the Labour Party.
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/paul-embery/trade-unions-should-wake-up_b_9193004.html
They were right then, they are right now.
There is no history of political extremists gaining control in this country in living memory, there is no NSDAP genie in the Brexit bottle, nor is there a USSR one.
If you want to protect the NHS and nationalise utilities/railways we can do out out the EU, once we have a socialist Government in charge.
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
That is a pretty dumb question.
The second worst user name/actual user accuracy after Two Professors.
One talks himself incessantly into corners by trying to sound clever, the complete opposite of cunning. The other is almost eye wateringly stupid to the point where you keep thinking it's a joke, but it's not.
What are you on about? It's about moving the company headquarters so that the disaster that is Brexit will not affect his business. It's about trade deals and protecting his position globally.
He said Brexit was a good thing. He's realised it's a nightmare and had acted accordingly.
Where the jobs are is not the point in the short term. But in the long run, they won't be here if this continues.
I presume the potential lost tax revenue is also an irrelevance to you?
What do I need to explain?
Because it's about where his company is registered not about jobs.
Dyson, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Nigel Lawson – the leave elite appears to want Brexit for everyone else but themselves
In the words of Bentley’s chief executive: “It’s Brexit that’s the killer … It would put at fundamental risk our chance of becoming profitable.”
How else are we to interpret Dyson’s admission that it’s moving to Singapore to be “future-proofed”? What future exactly does it wish to be proofed against?
P&O revealed that it will be re-registering its entire cross-Channel fleet of ferries under the flag of Cyprus. To their credit, P&O were upfront: they’re doing this because of Brexit.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...8QMjUVBsubPVH5gQg_QRdiT_PGwnud37Jke6Pg5lIqtjY
Anyone who genuinely doesn't see the writing on the wall is frankly, mentally deficient. Your Brexit champions are deserting you. And you ****ing voted for it
In the words of Bentley’s chief executive: “It’s Brexit that’s the killer … It would put at fundamental risk our chance of becoming profitable.”
How else are we to interpret Dyson’s admission that it’s moving to Singapore to be “future-proofed”? What future exactly does it wish to be proofed against?
P&O revealed that it will be re-registering its entire cross-Channel fleet of ferries under the flag of Cyprus. To their credit, P&O were upfront: they’re doing this because of Brexit.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...8QMjUVBsubPVH5gQg_QRdiT_PGwnud37Jke6Pg5lIqtjY
Anyone who genuinely doesn't see the writing on the wall is frankly, mentally deficient. Your Brexit champions are deserting you. And you ****ing voted for it
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,302
goods traded will be covered by where they are manufactured, rules of origin, not where the HQ is.
Baldseagull
Well-known member
Jesus wept. So Dyson is just doing this for fun then? I see.
Baldseagull
Well-known member
And yet Pastafarian chucks the insults in all the time too, and he clearly is an expert mass debater.
What makes you think that?
cunning fergus
Well-known member
- Jan 18, 2009
- 4,745
Indeed, the truth is no defence on here though.
If he is cute he will have restructred and made sure payments for royalties and IP are funnelling through to brassplated holding companies in Jersey.
Who knows?
Still it’s definitely a HQ registered in Singapore so let the gallons of piss soak deep into the mattresses.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,302
presumably for tax, or maybe the stated reason to put key leadership closer to their growing markets.
how trade works. ask google about rules of origin. but its pretty obvious otherwise a company in US creates a subsidary in Ireland, says all the goods are made by that company and bypass tariffs and regulations. they can do that with services where no physical good, origin is replaced by place of trade.
pastafarian
Well-known member
Im sorry you find truthful insight insulting, but i guess if you cant even accept the basics that a democratic vote should be carried out your moral compass and grasp of what you consider acceptable is always going to be off the scale anyway.