https://twitter.com/chrisrandwrites/status/1079499026754609152?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
At the risk of starting off a whole new argument, the vote was advisory only (as proved in law) and by no means is 17.4 million the majority. That's without mentioning the corruption, and breaking of Electoral Law, and being investigated by the National Crome Agency for organised crime.
swindonseagull
Well-known member
Complete rubbish......17.4 million was the majority who bothered voting......if the rest did not vote thats their loss same as a General election.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
If you say so.
swindonseagull
Well-known member
Truth hurts.
Albion Prem
Active member
There are always unused ships that can be charted
Albion Prem
Active member
trumps !!!!!!!!!
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Don't be silly. Tories and truth are complete opposites.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Amazing! How do the lorries drive on them?
swindonseagull
Well-known member
Another Red who would prefer Corbyn an Abbott ? God help us
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Don't jump to silly conclusions. I can't stand either of them either.
Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
Nothing's ever as simple as it looks but I agree with you. The activities of the British government from 80 years ago, with the people at its shoulder, should be a matter of pride.
There's a relevant subtext to the way British policy developed in the immediate prewar years. Although public opinion eventually swung round it was originally firmly in favour of turning its back on Europe and letting Hitler get on with whatever he was up to. If there had been a referendum on how to deal with German rearmament in (say) 1937 then 'appeasement' would have almost certainly won the day. In those circumstances should the Conservative Party have simply acquiesced and signed a peace treaty with Hitler? With the PM standing on the steps of Number 10 and announcing that 'appeasement means appeasement'? And, two and a half years after the referendum and with the situation becoming clearer by the day, should a new PM have refused to change that position?
And finally, if he did change his position, would the familiar faces be on here accusing Churchill, Halifax, whoever it was, of being an undemocratic loon?
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,324
Another person who supports political parties like football teams
Sent from my BLA-L09 using Tapatalk
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,324
A referendum isn't a general election, you aren't the first to make that simple mistake.
Sent from my BLA-L09 using Tapatalk
Cheshire Cat
The most curious thing..
swindonseagull
Well-known member
I know what the word MAJORITY means.
swindonseagull
Well-known member
Wrong .......you can change political allegiance you cant change football teams......unless you are a glory hunter.
Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,310
at the risk of joining in and countering this tired old argument, Parliament voted to execute article 50.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
Indeed.
And every single MP who voted to trigger Article 50 now has to own the consequences and forget about spinning any Project Blame.