[Politics] Brexit

Herr Tubthumper · Jan 18, 2017

studio150 said:
Or it could be that you post inaccurate details, refuse to accept that it is wrong, fail to answer questions, read something into a post that isn't actually there..................

And is happy to dish it out the abuse but gets upset when he gets, merely, questioned.

portslade seagull · Jan 18, 2017

Baldseagull said:
For trade yes, one block, with 27 nations able to voice an opinion, and there are concerns for every nation in those negotiations, which is one reason they take a while. But we are also going to be discussing the right to remain for Uk citizens living in the EU and vice versa, the terms on future workers coming and going, and passporting or something similar for financial services. There is a bit more to this one.

Wasn't the passport issue one of the 1st things they wanted to deal with.

Baldseagull · Jan 18, 2017

pastafarian said:
respectfully,
i think you are missing the point.
The commons will vote on the "agreed" deal,that is to say when the other side have accepted the terms
after following their own process, that is after The Council agree by qualified majority and get the consent from the European Parliament.

it would be a bit silly having our commons vote on the deal before the other side had agreed its terms

I respectfully disagree, I suspect it will be put before both, and we are likely to be quicker at determining if it is a goer or not.

Baldseagull · Jan 18, 2017

portslade seagull said:
Wasn't the passport issue one of the 1st things they wanted to deal with.

Yes it is, most think it would be wise to make a concession here, France does not, and I am not sure they are alone

studio150 · Jan 18, 2017

Buzzer said:
So basically you admit to online bullying and these are your reasons.

No if something is factually wrong then whywould you let it go. Its just that some people post inaccurate detail far more than others. Its not just a view ir opinion where people will obviously differ.
But if someone posts for example that x number if people are thrown out of a country per month when in fact x is the annual figure what would you do. Ignore it or say there is an error?

Buzzer · Jan 18, 2017

Herr Tubthumper said:
And is happy to dish it out the abuse but gets upset when he gets, merely, questioned.

Funny how one man's "merely questioned" is another's relentless bullying.

portslade seagull · Jan 18, 2017

Baldseagull said:
Yes it is, most think it would be wise to make a concession here, France does not, and I am not sure they are alone

There will be concessions on both sides. It will be a bumpy ride, buckle up !

daveybgtt · Jan 18, 2017

Over 2.5k pages? Some of you lot need to turn it in, is there nothing better you could be doing with your time?

There is a whole world out there to explore, and you choose to spend forever and a day re-hashing the same old shite arguments with the same old mugs who couldn't care less about your stupid opinion, anymore than you care about theirs. No minds will be changed, no argument will be "won"

Go outside, turn off notifications and get a life.

Herr Tubthumper · Jan 18, 2017

studio150 said:
No if something is factually wrong then whywould you let it go. Its just that some people post inaccurate detail far more than others. Its not just a view ir opinion where people will obviously differ.
But if someone posts for example that x number if people are thrown out of a country per month when in fact x is the annual figure what would you do. Ignore it or say there is an error?

Quite. And when someone posts something in a chat room I think it's perfectly fair to ask questions of it.

Blue3 · Jan 18, 2017

HSBC has announced 1000 jobs moving to Paris taking 5% of their turnover

2015/2016 tax year the UKs banks provided 25% of the U.Ks disposable income

Just imagine that all the UKs banks follow the lead of HSBC and take 5% of the tax out of our system

Baldseagull · Jan 18, 2017

portslade seagull said:
There was some guy on the BBC think he owned some sort of carrot picking/packaging firm. He was complaining believe it or not about migrants returning home and the fact that he now had to pay higher wages to entice the locals to fill the vacancies. Proves a point I suppose about wages being surpressed by unskilled migrants

Yet larus is bigging up the average wage increase in the UK, I personally think all the increase has come from those at the top, and those at the very bottom due to minimum wage increases. Most of the population is worse off.

Lincoln Imp · Jan 18, 2017

pastafarian said:
No No No,That wasnt the right answer. Do you really really really want The United Kingdom to remain a member of The European Union or leave The European Union. We will keep coming back again until you say remain.

We must agree to disagree about what drove many people, people with zero interest in politics, to vote as they did. Meanwhile, I hope you didn't spend too much time on your spoof question.

larus · Jan 18, 2017

Baldseagull said:
Yet larus is bigging up the average wage increase in the UK, I personally think all the increase has come from those at the top, and those at the very bottom due to minimum wage increases. Most of the population is worse off.

Based on what? Pure speculation. Well, I speculate that the elite have all taken a huge pay cut and distributed that to the poor

Buzzer · Jan 18, 2017

studio150 said:
No if something is factually wrong then whywould you let it go. Its just that some people post inaccurate detail far more than others. Its not just a view ir opinion where people will obviously differ.
But if someone posts for example that x number if people are thrown out of a country per month when in fact x is the annual figure what would you do. Ignore it or say there is an error?

Sorry but that's utter rubbish. You don't just proffer an opinion when challenged you go out of your way to bait him and accuse him of all sorts. None of these posts below by you are replying directly to a Soulman post but to another poster's comment. You're just getting massive digs in when you can - and all of these are within the last few days.

studio150 said:
But you should be rejoicing he has actually answered a question - the wrong one but miracles dont happen very often

studio150 said:
Being too modest 'might' should be replaced with 'will'

studio150 said:
Welcome to the [MENTION=26105]Soulman[/MENTION] world of not answering questions and using the its in the future defence

studio150 said:
Another unanswered question?

and on and on and on.

Soulman · Jan 18, 2017

Questions, questions..... this sprang to mind.

Baldseagull · Jan 18, 2017

Blue3 said:
HSBC has announced 1000 jobs moving to Paris taking 5% of their turnover

2015/2016 tax year the UKs banks provided 25% of the U.Ks disposable income

Just imagine that all the UKs banks follow the lead of HSBC and take 5% of the tax out of our system

Nothing immediate, but it will bolster the French in calling for a deal that excludes at least some financial services. I am starting to think they will let clearing go for now, but come for it later.

studio150 · Jan 18, 2017

Buzzer said:
Sorry but that's utter rubbish. You don't just proffer an opinion when challenged you go out of your way to bait him and accuse him of all sorts. None of these posts below by you are replying directly to a Soulman post but to another poster's comment. You're just getting massive digs in when you can - and all of these are within the last few days.

and on and on and on.

I cant be bothered to go back over page after page to prove otherwise or where your comments are reversed.
But to keep you happy I have banned myself from this thread.

GoldWithFalmer · Jan 18, 2017

studio150 said:
I cant be bothered to go back over page after page to prove otherwise or where your comments are reversed.
But to keep you happy I have banned mtself from this thread.

see u tomorrow then :wave:

wellquickwoody · Jan 18, 2017

beorhthelm said:
its funny, remainers spent so much energy talking about how EU is a single trade block in negotiations, now want to claim theres going to be 27 countries to negotiate with. which is it? there will be a negotiation with the EU's designated man, the EU members have to ratify it, which they will be told to do, as happens with EU.

You really are clutching at straws aren't you? The negotiations will be with one body, the EU. If just one of the 27 other nations think the deal offered to the UK is too generous they can veto it, end of deal. The Maltese have already drawn a line in the sand saying that WHATEVER the deal is, it must be inferior to being part of the club. Good luck everyone.

Lincoln Imp · Jan 18, 2017

Buzzer said:
Sorry but that's utter rubbish. You don't just proffer an opinion when challenged you go out of your way to bait him and accuse him of all sorts. None of these posts below by you are replying directly to a Soulman post but to another poster's comment. You're just getting massive digs in when you can - and all of these are within the last few days.

and on and on and on.

I don't like bullying at all but in fairness this seems quite mild compared to the stuff PPF and others (Maldini?) spew out.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?

Remain

Leave

Wouldn’t vote

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Languidly Clinical

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Languidly Clinical

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Seaweed! Seaweed!

Many More Voting Years

Well-known member

Share this page