- Jun 27, 2012
- 13,880
That's fine Jem. However the only reason I entered the discussion was because you thought they were good enough to be first choice
Ha ! No. i think thats unlikely.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Glenn Murray
- Thread starter samtheseagull
- Start date
Ha ! No. i think thats unlikely.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 10,670
3 is not what I would call ''goals where ever he has gone'' ...the quality if the team is irrelevant in context....my point would be that suddenly Murray becomes the Messiah ...personally I'm not so sure...still we will see what happens in time
Being a complete pedant - 3 is goals, so my statement is not incorrect. But I take your point.
He is a goal scorer, proven at championship level.
Even at a rate of 3 in 21 (predominantly as a sub) - he would match Bobby's total for the season.
No-one is considering that to be a waste of wages though.
IMO Murray is the ideal replacement for Bobby. That may not be the plan though.
If the club have decided that they want to bring in 2 younger, proven goal scorers and FFP be damned.... Well I won't be complaining!
TSB
Captain Hindsight
We're not.
This endless stream of Glenn Murray bollocks derails more threads than BG.
samtheseagull
Well-known member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 1,599
- Thread starter
- #104
I dont think it would be a bad signing but depends on wages. I wouldn't want us to blow a lot of our budget on him to be honest
TSB
Captain Hindsight
Not for £30k a week.
If we really wanted him, he'd already be here.
No doubt, CH is entirely fed up of dealing with Bournemouth too.
Last edited:
Betfair Bozo
Well-known member
- Jul 24, 2007
- 2,096
TSB
Captain Hindsight
CH wanted to sign him in January/the loan window but we withdrew interest after they slapped a fee on top of wages.
He's six months older, has played no football, and we have all summer to find someone better rather than limited to whomever's available mid-season.
Is my reasoning.
Meade's Ball
Well-known member
I like the idea of Murray's goals and the enjoyment in his leap, but i'd want him to join to be a part of what we are, a ruddy hard working side from front to back. If he has a lust for ardour and being an element of our collective gusto, then come on board.
Betfair Bozo
Well-known member
- Jul 24, 2007
- 2,096
37k a week is the figure I was told (via an ex-player who reguarly see's him still). That's excluding what he gets for being contracted as an 'Adidas Athlete', which is supposedly another few £k a week - which i'm not sure he would get by dropping down a level...
- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,221
I loved Glenn Murray when he played for us. I didn't even hate him all that much when he played for Them, as he never once gave it the big one when he scored against us, even though he'd had dogs' abuse all match.
If you'd asked me whether I'd have been keen on Albion signing a deal with him last summer, or last January, I'd have been all over it. He might have made the difference that would have got us a point more than Boro.
Now, I'm just not so sure. We're already in clear out mode, with a few genuine heroes, along with a few bits of deadwood going out of the door. The club has to look forward, and to make sure there's not a hangover from our near miss this season. Murray's a very decent striker, but at 32 he probably doesn't represent the future, nor an investment opportunity for the club.
If they did sign him, I'd be fine with it, of course. But I don't find myself really wishing for it to happen like I might have done in the past. And I certainly don't see him as a main striker these days.
If you'd asked me whether I'd have been keen on Albion signing a deal with him last summer, or last January, I'd have been all over it. He might have made the difference that would have got us a point more than Boro.
Now, I'm just not so sure. We're already in clear out mode, with a few genuine heroes, along with a few bits of deadwood going out of the door. The club has to look forward, and to make sure there's not a hangover from our near miss this season. Murray's a very decent striker, but at 32 he probably doesn't represent the future, nor an investment opportunity for the club.
If they did sign him, I'd be fine with it, of course. But I don't find myself really wishing for it to happen like I might have done in the past. And I certainly don't see him as a main striker these days.
Hotchilidog
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2009
- 8,692
If we can get Glenn on a club friendly contract then I have no problem with him coming back. He's a proven goalscorer at both premiership and championship level and in my opinion a fairly safe bet for a few goals. With Murray and Hemed you'd have a few goals in the bank (especially when you consider the service they'd get from the wings and set pieces). By getting Murray on board it gives the club a little security when they take a flyer on our new younger hot shot who we have currently never heard of.
Indeed. Or been the striker we needed to finish off Wednesday in the second leg. Hemed was a big miss for that game.
In the world of trying to get promoted from the Championship into the Premier League neither of those things matter. If you don't though...
- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,221
Suppose what I'm trying to say is that I wouldn't see him as the main man. If he was the big signing of the summer I might be slightly underwhelmed, though I don't doubt he'd contribute in terms of goals.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 10,670
Absolutely This.
For me the big signing needs to be a significant upgrade on Baldock.
If we get that, then Murray would be an excellent replacement for Bobby.
Wowza.
Dirk Lehmann's Python
New member
Would you rather he was playing for or against us next season?
End of story.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
End of story.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
was'nt like that when he first signed LACONIC is the word maybe its because he was homesick
.............now he is buying land and property down here.........................and its still a NO from me