Albumen
Don't wait for me!
With little money to spend Id hope the money would be going elsewhere. If we had luxury and patience for Buckley, and a hole for Bridcutt to fit then yes, but as we've got neither I cant see the point in the thread.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Buckley & Bridcutt
- Thread starter perseus
- Start date
Iamapen15
New member
I don't necessarily want either back, but I wouldn't complain about seeing a fit and committed Buckley. Bidcutt has burnt his bridges somewhat, and we've got plays and prospects in the midfield.
symyjym
Banned
"Buckley made a sporadic impact during an injury-hit first season at Sunderland after his £2.5million move, but like Bridcutt, there are still question marks over his Premier League credentials.
The winger returned from injury during Advocaat’s reign at the end of the campaign and was handed a start at Stoke City.
But Buckley was hauled off at the interval and only featured once more under the Dutchman."
http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport...sunderland-midfielder-liam-bridcutt-1-7344147
symyjym
Banned
Buckley for sure if he's gotten over his growing pains ... when fit he was one of the stand out performers and we need someone with his turn of speed and ability to run at defences
Not too bothered by Bridcutt's shenanigans but we're well covered in that area, so No
Not too bothered by Bridcutt's shenanigans but we're well covered in that area, so No
Depends heavily on what other players we bring in. If the market for other wingers don't represent better or equal value for a player of equal or better quality, then I see no reason not to get Buckley. For 1.5M, or possibly less, I doubt you'll find a better player at his age. Proven in the Chamlionship, but with a not so perfect injury record.
At this stage, Brighton still need to bring in a centre back (top priority), 1-2 wingers and a 'creative' forward. With FFP being a thing, how much money can we spend on each? I doubt we'll be able to spend millions on each area we need. Hopefully, more freebies can come our way. I actually think we've brought in some very good players for next to nothing.
Central midfield isn't an area we need to strengthen as a priority, therefore no money should be wasted there. So it's a no to Bridcutt.
At this stage, Brighton still need to bring in a centre back (top priority), 1-2 wingers and a 'creative' forward. With FFP being a thing, how much money can we spend on each? I doubt we'll be able to spend millions on each area we need. Hopefully, more freebies can come our way. I actually think we've brought in some very good players for next to nothing.
Central midfield isn't an area we need to strengthen as a priority, therefore no money should be wasted there. So it's a no to Bridcutt.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Quite apart from the fact that Buckley is a crock and Bridcutt is a prick, if they did end up back here then you'd have to question just how motivated they'd be. A drop in division, a drop in wages, both back here as abject FAILURES.
Nope, I wouldn't touch either of them with a shitty stick.
Nope, I wouldn't touch either of them with a shitty stick.
Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 14,852
If we assume that the club is looking to get into the Premier League, we need players that can cut it in the Premier League. Besides all the other reasons given to steer clear, given that – on their performances last season (especially Bridcutt), and Sunderland's willingness to get rid – they can't, why would we want them back?
Look forward, not back.
Look forward, not back.
murraymints4brighton
Well-known member
I'd quite like us to have some attacking midfield players who don't spend half the season out with hamstring injuries. Buckley, evidentially, does not fit that criteria. Would be really chuffed to see us sign Marshall from Blackburn as I believe his ability in assisting goals to be better.
Ask for Bridcutt, I kind of feel he was a player relying heavily on confidence and at the right club at the right time. I'm not so sure he will hit those heights again.
Ask for Bridcutt, I kind of feel he was a player relying heavily on confidence and at the right club at the right time. I'm not so sure he will hit those heights again.
sydney
tinky ****in winky
Buckley.....paper mache legs ....Bridcutt did the wrong thing by the club...... not bothered about either of them.
supaseagull
Well-known member
If these two were not previously Brighton players and were sold to Sunderland and were subsequently linked with us, most fans would be getting over excited if we were linked with them.
Regardless of what happened in the past, if we are serious about promotion this year, both players are exactly the type signings we need to make and so on that basis, yes I would take both back in a heartbeat.
Besides when Peter Ward kicked up a fuss with Mullery back in 1980 and went on the transfer list (albeit it he came off for a couple of months) and then only to be sold to Forest and then return on loan, no one complained then...Other than the calibre of the player, the circumstances are no different.
Regardless of what happened in the past, if we are serious about promotion this year, both players are exactly the type signings we need to make and so on that basis, yes I would take both back in a heartbeat.
Besides when Peter Ward kicked up a fuss with Mullery back in 1980 and went on the transfer list (albeit it he came off for a couple of months) and then only to be sold to Forest and then return on loan, no one complained then...Other than the calibre of the player, the circumstances are no different.
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
Both would improve our team MASSIVLY.
God, we miss Bridcutt. Rohan Ince is like a mad scientists bodged attempt to make a bigger stronger bridcutt.
God, we miss Bridcutt. Rohan Ince is like a mad scientists bodged attempt to make a bigger stronger bridcutt.
Sometimes you see a post that so precisely captures your thoughts on a matter that a thumbs up or "this" doesn't capture the vigorousness of the nodding that ensues when first you read it. Nothing but a proper post will suffice. So:
this.
Nonsense.
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
You make some very eloquent and analytically detailed points. However, are you suggesting ince is anywhere near the class the of bridcutt as a DM?
A DM has to be a calming influence on the team. I reckon ince sloppily gives it away on purpose just to then HUNT down his prey and get a nice little cheer for winning it back.
Last edited:
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 30,586
One of the reasons blamed for Buckley's poor injury record with us was the rubbish training facilities we used to have at the Albion. We now have a shiny new state of the art training complex, so this should help him.
Sunderland's facilities are also top notch and it's interesting to see he went through last season with no major injury setbacks.
The bottom line is we've already bid £1.5 mill for Marshall and the Blackburn manager has said that wouldn't even buy his right foot. I would definitely take Buckley back for £1.5 mill now.
Sunderland's facilities are also top notch and it's interesting to see he went through last season with no major injury setbacks.
The bottom line is we've already bid £1.5 mill for Marshall and the Blackburn manager has said that wouldn't even buy his right foot. I would definitely take Buckley back for £1.5 mill now.
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/spor...rland-suffering-due-buckleys-extended-8822226
From March:
Gus Poyet believes Will Buckley’s continuing absence has hampered Sunderland’s Premier League progress.
Winger Buckley has been out of action for almost two months due to a knee injury, and remains sidelined for this weekend’s crucial game against fellow strugglers Aston Villa at the Stadium of Light.
Poyet is convinced that Buckley - who played under him at Brighton, before joining the Black Cats last summer in a £2.5m deal - has a big part to play on Wearside, but so far injuries have restricted the 25-year-old to just eight Premier League starts.
Buckley’s last outing came against Fulham in the FA Cup at the end of January, but he has not started a game since New Year’s Day and has played a total of less than 80 minutes’ league action in 2015.
Made 9 league starts last season, played 90 minutes four times.
Last edited:
severnside gull
Well-known member
I'd take Buckley back tomorrow. He is everything we need and we have no-one like him.
Bridcutt maybe better than we have but we are good enough to get by in the defensive mid department and bringing him back would cost a lot in both fees and wages with no guarantee we could move someone on to cover some of the cost. He will go to Derby I think and if they don't walk the league this year it'll be a surprise and they will be in serious financial trouble.
Bridcutt maybe better than we have but we are good enough to get by in the defensive mid department and bringing him back would cost a lot in both fees and wages with no guarantee we could move someone on to cover some of the cost. He will go to Derby I think and if they don't walk the league this year it'll be a surprise and they will be in serious financial trouble.
I would have Buckley back even not at his best at the right price. He is a player that might only produce a few bright spots in a game but they usually lead to big chances of scoring. There were a lot of games where the only chances have come through him.
I do however think he is a crock. He has spent too much time on the treatment table in the last 5 years to get right ever again.
I do however think he is a crock. He has spent too much time on the treatment table in the last 5 years to get right ever again.