Blackadder
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Of course it's too old. When those kids are 15, she will be 80 (if still alive). Not fair on the kids.
Evening Neanderthals, my old Dad is 63 years old, he lives life to the fullest. I'm one of 5, we range from 42 to 15, he spreads his time amongst us the best he can. His main priority is the welfare of my little brother and sister, for that he has my total respect as hopefully he'll get at least at one/two of our up bringings right. I can assure you both of them have benefitted from a very good upbringing, the best he could manage, so any of you pompous twats that think age IS a relevance then I can assure you you're wrong. Regards, Sam.
From that nonsense I'm assuming you're the 15 year old.
Harsh. Obviously a touchy subject for people with older parents but, I agree, there is a world of difference between a 48 year old bloke having a child (most likely with an at least a bit younger woman) and a 65 year old choosing to get herself pregnant again. Madness.From that nonsense I'm assuming you're the 15 year old.
Evening Neanderthals, my old Dad is 63 years old, he lives life to the fullest. I'm one of 5, we range from 42 to 15, he spreads his time amongst us the best he can. His main priority is the welfare of my little brother and sister, for that he has my total respect as hopefully he'll get at least at one/two of our up bringings right. I can assure you both of them have benefitted from a very good upbringing, the best he could manage, so any of you pompous twats that think age IS a relevance then I can assure you you're wrong. Regards, Sam.
No, I'm 32, but thanks for assuming you ****ing helmet. My point being is that age is irrelevant as long as the parent cares/loves the children enough. You ****ing bell end
My youngest brother is 15 years old, and still receives total dedication from my Dad, age is purely a number but judgemental folk like yourself won't be able to see past it. PM if you'd like to discuss further the merits of an elder parent.The ages of your Dad and this woman are too different to be relevant. I see he taught you some nice manners though ;-)
Love your parents all you want doesn't make much difference when at aged 16 their mates are out enjoying themselves and they're at home looking after a parent with dementia. Selfish and life ruining for the child.
Evening Neanderthals, my old Dad is 63 years old, he lives life to the fullest. I'm one of 5, we range from 42 to 15, he spreads his time amongst us the best he can. His main priority is the welfare of my little brother and sister, for that he has my total respect as hopefully he'll get at least at one/two of our up bringings right. I can assure you both of them have benefitted from a very good upbringing, the best he could manage, so any of you pompous twats that think age IS a relevance then I can assure you you're wrong. Regards, Sam.
My youngest brother is 15 years old, and still receives total dedication from my Dad, age is purely a number but judgemental folk like yourself won't be able to see past it. PM if you'd like to discuss further the merits of an elder parent.
Of course it's too old. When those kids are 15, she will be 80 (if still alive). Not fair on the kids.
No, I'm 32, but thanks for assuming you ****ing helmet. My point being is that age is irrelevant as long as the parent cares/loves the children enough. You ****ing bell end
Until she has an unexpected health issue and dies when the children are 5 or under? It's a horrific decision. The human body is not designed to naturally conceive past a certain point.I would bet a lot of money she will be a better parent than most 16-20 year old women giving birth.