Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

What should the world do If/When IS raise the ancient site of Palmyra to the ground ?



Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
42,817
Lancing
I understand the outcry about human life, likewise I don't understand the attitude of " there only ancient ruins who gives a fck ? "
 






symyjym

Banned
Nov 2, 2009
13,138
Brighton / Hove actually
The logic concerning Assad on NSC earlier in this war was to bomb the **** out of him...now people worrying about ruins

Not from me, I always thought the West encouraging uprisings doesn't make sense because it condones and glorifies killing. It teaches people that it is ok to kill for what they believe in. Had we not supported the idea of toppling of Assad there wouldn't have been a war against IS in Syria to choose not to help in, and we would have avoided all this mess.
 












vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,894
Could we sue ? Or we could send Mr Cameron over there to give them a stiff talking to.
 






Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,592
I was only in Palmyra Square earlier. I would hate to see such beautiful architecture destroyed.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,755
Gloucester
Not from me, I always thought the West encouraging uprisings doesn't make sense because it condones and glorifies killing. It teaches people that it is ok to kill for what they believe in. Had we not supported the idea of toppling of Assad there wouldn't have been a war against IS in Syria to choose not to help in, and we would have avoided all this mess.
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!

I said something similar in a thread on here a year or so ago (when Syria started kicking off) - and some knobhead accused me of being a Daily Mail reader!
 




BlockDpete

Well-known member
Oct 8, 2005
1,143
Of course human life is more important than a pile of ruins.

But it does grate that ISIS are trying to destroy culture and history. Reminds me of the Nazis "Burning Books".

Its seems incredible that an organisation can get so wound up about some ruins in the sands. Shall we go and blow up Stonehenge perhaps?

ISIS seem to want a very pure form of Islam. Except for mobile phones, Facebook and YourTube of course.
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
52,496
Burgess Hill
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!

I said something similar in a thread on here a year or so ago (when Syria started kicking off) - and some knobhead accused me of being a Daily Mail reader!

I was working in Saudi for a bit in 2002. Very strong view from the locals there was that they hated Saddam and a lot of what he did, but accepted he had the region by the balls, preventing the extremists rising and that taking him and his regime out would instantly destabilise the whole region.
 


Gregory2Smith1

J'les aurai!
Sep 21, 2011
5,476
Auch
since the rest of the world has basically washed it's hands of the situation

I suspect Iran is waiting for the battle of Baghdad

Iraq didn't exist 100 years ago and probably won't exist in 10 years time either

Iran will do the world's dirty work,hopefully they will be left to get on with it

Iran's military might will make light work of IS

hopefully the Kurds will get some sort of autonomous gain out of this

Iran will profit greatly and rightly so,doing all the donkey work

Syria will probably gain too,by the back door,a little like France did in the 2nd World War

the Turks must be fuming,now being part of NATO

a chance to gain some of the old Turkish Empire back,but strictly out of bounds
 




GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,755
Gloucester
I was working in Saudi for a bit in 2002. Very strong view from the locals there was that they hated Saddam and a lot of what he did, but accepted he had the region by the balls, preventing the extremists rising and that taking him and his regime out would instantly destabilise the whole region.
Exactly.
 


symyjym

Banned
Nov 2, 2009
13,138
Brighton / Hove actually
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!

I said something similar in a thread on here a year or so ago (when Syria started kicking off) - and some knobhead accused me of being a Daily Mail reader!

Yep, Saddam and Gaddafi were weak and we could dictate to them. Bashar al-Assad didn't have a history of human rights abuse, though his dad may have ruled with too firm a fist before him. Other than that Assad was a medical student in London and always came over as Westernised.

Islamic State was born from al-Qaida in Iraq, who are Saddam's ex officers, generals and army. They are running this campaign.

This is a good BBC doc and they go into how IS spawned from within Iraqi prison camps.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b05s4ytp/this-world-worlds-richest-terror-army
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,313
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!

what you are basically saying is, keeping those tyrannical leaders in power was great because it stopped another tyrannical power. net gain? nothing.

Islamic State was born from al-Qaida in Iraq, who are Saddam's ex officers, generals and army. They are running this campaign.

it was founded by a Jordanian and joined al-Qaida when it suited them to do so. we must stop recasting links of a few as evidence that this is somehow the west's fault. a few Iraqi officers (from a broadly secular army) does not mean this is the Iraqi army; a few with al-qaida links does not mean its from that group (its too informal a group anyway). we have various people seeking power and/or religious objectives jumping from one bandwagon to the next. esssentially the ethos behind ISIL has been a fundemental part of some in Islam for centuries, to creating a religious lead caphilate. the west has only precipitated this to happen now, rather than at some other point.
 






Igzilla

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2012
1,646
Worthing
Of course human life is more important than a pile of ruins.

But it does grate that ISIS are trying to destroy culture and history. Reminds me of the Nazis "Burning Books".

Its seems incredible that an organisation can get so wound up about some ruins in the sands. Shall we go and blow up Stonehenge perhaps?

ISIS seem to want a very pure form of Islam. Except for mobile phones, Facebook and YourTube of course.

And pornography. Lots of pornography.
 


SIMMO SAYS

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2012
11,717
Incommunicado
As this would be a horror against the whole of Humanity. It is site of immense beauty and importance but before it was built before the days of their God, it is a falsehood. I fear this is only a matter of time and it will be utterly heart breaking, religious or not.

If/When this happens and we see it posted on youtube being smashed down and blown up, what should or could the World do ?

Friday debate
With respect Uncle Spielberg.
Personally I''ll just have a :drink:
I'm at a loss why all these people fight over religion.
In my 40 years of working I have never had time off for the odd prayer---coz I'm too fecking busy.
Who cares what these medieval people do to their own history.
Hopefully Cameron will not send any of our troops over so let them get on with it.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here