The Albion all time Hooters XI

Kosh

'The' Yaztromo

Jul 14, 2003

5,218

Yaztromo's Tower; the borders of Darkwood Forest

• Oct 23, 2014

• #1

From another thread, but it got me thinking... Who would make the Albion largest hooters XI? Yeah it aint war and peace, but it's something I think NSC needs to resolve and NOW (for me at least) that time has finally arrived.

Thus Far I have:

CB - Colin 'Hee Haw' kins.
CB - Colin 'class act' Pates.
RB - Darren 'Frankenstein's Monster' Carr?!? I'm not sure if that was his name, but I'm sure he had a large facial growth of sorts.

ST - Fran 'by a nose' Sandaza.

Hmmmm but who else...

 

Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Apr 30, 2013

13,787

Herts

• Oct 23, 2014

• #2

LB - Stephen Ward

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,090

West Sussex

• Oct 23, 2014

• #3

How disappointing... I was hoping for something else altogether

 

Kosh

'The' Yaztromo

Jul 14, 2003

5,218

Yaztromo's Tower; the borders of Darkwood Forest

• Oct 23, 2014

• Thread starter
• #4

This one could well and run and ahem run... Indeed you could probably stuff a pillow with the nose hair trimmings from the back four alone!

 

Wrong-Direction

Well-known member

Mar 10, 2013

13,419

• Oct 23, 2014

• #5

Kosh said:

From another thread, but it got me thinking... Who would make the Albion largest hooters XI? Yeah it aint war and peace, but it's something I think NSC needs to resolve and NOW (for me at least) that time has finally arrived.

Thus Far I have:

CB - Colin 'Hee Haw' kins.
CB - Colin 'class act' Pates.
RB - Darren 'Frankenstein's Monster' Carr?!? I'm not sure if that was his name, but I'm sure he had a large facial growth of sorts.

ST - Fran 'by a nose' Sandaza.

Hmmmm but who else...

Click to expand...

...

 

Attachments

• 
  uploadfromtaptalk1414079433190.jpg

  1.7 MB · Views: 26

Kosh

'The' Yaztromo

Jul 14, 2003

5,218

Yaztromo's Tower; the borders of Darkwood Forest

• Oct 23, 2014

• Thread starter
• #6

That midfield could do a job, right now if I'm perfectly honest.

 

Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Apr 30, 2013

13,787

Herts

• Oct 23, 2014

• #7

Wrong-Direction said:

...

Click to expand...

and that image takes the thread here. Not Google-friendly, I'm afraid.

 

Wrong-Direction

Well-known member

Mar 10, 2013

13,419

• Oct 23, 2014

• #8

Goldstone1976 said:

and that image takes the thread here. Not Google-friendly, I'm afraid.

Click to expand...

But there's loads of pictures on Google?

 

Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Apr 30, 2013

13,787

Herts

• Oct 23, 2014

• #9

Wrong-Direction said:

But there's loads of pictures on Google?

Click to expand...

Indeed there are. However Google provide most of the hosting fees (through ads) for NSC, running to several £k pa. One of the stipulations of continuing to receive those funds is that we don't have overly sexualised images on the BB. Here, where there are no ads, it's ok. Google regularly look over the site to ensure that Bozza's ensuring that the BB is adhering to the conditions. The last time was only a couple of weeks or so ago.

 

Wrong-Direction

Well-known member

Mar 10, 2013

13,419

• Oct 23, 2014

• #10

Goldstone1976 said:

Indeed there are. However Google provide most of the hosting fees (through ads) for NSC, running to several £k pa. One of the stipulations of continuing to receive those funds is that we don't have overly sexualised images on the BB. Here, where there are no ads, it's ok. Google regularly look over the site to ensure that Bozza's ensuring that the BB is adhering to the conditions. The last time was only a couple of weeks or so ago.

Click to expand...

Oh, noted

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,090

West Sussex

• Oct 23, 2014

• #11

Goldstone1976 said:

Indeed there are. However Google provide most of the hosting fees (through ads) for NSC, running to several £k pa. One of the stipulations of continuing to receive those funds is that we don't have overly sexualised images on the BB. Here, where there are no ads, it's ok. Google regularly look over the site to ensure that Bozza's ensuring that the BB is adhering to the conditions. The last time was only a couple of weeks or so ago.

Click to expand...

I do appreciate the importance of this issue... but do Google really get 'upset' by images that they themselves include with their 'Safe Search' filter set on??

 

Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Apr 30, 2013

13,787

Herts

• Oct 23, 2014

• #12

Titanic said:

I do appreciate the importance of this issue... but do Google really get 'upset' by images that they themselves include with their 'Safe Search' filter set on??

Click to expand...

It's very hard to tell, tbh. The latest guidance received from them said that they didn't want see, inter alia, undue attention to breasts. For sure it's a fine line what constitutes undue attention, but I suspect that the image above could reasonably be interpreted as doing so. It's not as though we receive a library of images with notations of what is acceptable and what is unacceptable. Given the recent warning shot from them, Bozza asked us to err on the side of caution.