Huddersfield 0 Albion 5..............

edna krabappel said:

I honestly didn't come away from Huddersfield thinking we'd been nobbled by the officials, if truth be told.

LuaLua's first yellow was for running over to an incident that was nothing to do with him and giving the official a mouthful. His own bloody fault, and from that moment on, he's skating on thin ice.

What was Dunk's card for: was that dissent too? He certainly got involved a couple of times unnecessarily.

I do feel people are clutching at straws if they feel the officials are somehow responsible for our position.

Click to expand...

kevo said:

I don't think anyone's saying that - just that five cards versus nil seems disproportionate. I can't believe NONE of the Huddersfield fouls were worse than Kaz's which led to his second booking and suspension.

Click to expand...

murraymints4brighton said:

Lua Lua was correctly booked for dissent and it was needless for him to go over there. That said, all game I was cursing the officials who I saw to be incredibly biased. There were no reckless challenges (bar maybe Greer's one for the team in the 2nd half) yet every slight foul we seemed to be booked for whereas they would commit almost identical fouls, and remain unpunished.

Click to expand...

mona said:

Interesting that the ref, Gary Sutton, hasn't booked a single Huddersfield player in his last three games of reffing them.......according to a referee stats site.

Click to expand...