The establishment and historic child sex abuse

Psychobilly freakout said:

Shit day at the office need to go home and unwind, have a good evening

Click to expand...

8ace said:

Bet he'll get a shorter sentence than someone convicted of throwing a chair outside a pub after a football match.

Click to expand...

Dick Head said:

I did not have you down for politely and reasonably backing down from a good binfest.

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

I think he's innocent and a miscarriage of justice. All these victims now wanting his millions. Seems to me like a massive scam like insurance on houses and car claims.

Click to expand...

red star portslade said:

Are you on heavy duty medication, or just stupid?
This loathsome scumbag preyed on girls as young as seven, and subjected them to serious sexual assaults, including penetration, whilst hypocritically throwing his weight behind a campaign for young kids to report paedophiles.

That abuse destroyed lives - one of his victims repeatedly attempted suicide, yet still he denied any wrongdoing to the last - he didn't even have the good grace to admit his crimes.

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

Where's the prove? Only evidence is on hear say.

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

Where's the prove? Only evidence is on hear say.[/QUOTE


Rolf Harris was found guilty of 12 counts. I'm trying to weigh who's the bigger ****. You or him.

Click to expand...

red star portslade said:

Footsoldier said:

Where's the prove? Only evidence is on hear say.[/QUOTE


Rolf Harris was found guilty of 12 counts. I'm trying to weigh who's the bigger ****. You or him.

Click to expand...

Only by hear say though. Any DNA?

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

red star portslade said:

Only by hear say though. Any DNA?

Click to expand...

Ok mate. we'll leave it there.

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

Where's the prove? Only evidence is on hear say.

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

red star portslade said:

Only by hear say though. Any DNA?

Click to expand...

Hearsay evidence is evidence by a witness of what they heard someone else say - so totally not relevant in this case.

The evidence in this case was direct.

Click to expand...

Barrel of Fun said:

[MENTION=27749]Footsoldier[/MENTION] you seem to be implying that his victims are doing this for compensation. It is exactly this attitude and mindset that stops people coming forward and preventing justice from being served.

A bit more respect for those whom have had to relive every gory detail of their hidden past wouldn't go a miss.

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

[MENTION=3788]Barrel of Fun[/MENTION], excuse me? What are you trying to say, that I'm not allowed an opinion? You saying that this board will determine the outcome of weather or not females will come forward? Isn't this board for debating whetehr what view you hold or are we suppose to be yes posters and conform with the verdict?

Click to expand...

Barrel of Fun said:

I'm not suggesting for one minute that you are not entitled to an opinion. I'm suggesting that your opinion makes a mockery of sexual assault.

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

And why is that then? How many people have been found guilty then only many years later been found to be innocent.

Click to expand...

Barrel of Fun said:

I've absolutely no idea. I'd be interested to know. How many?

Click to expand...

Footsoldier said:

And when you say it makes a mockery of sexual assault then did you know that four women have been sentenced to prison last month for accusing men of rape when they were absolute lies. Now that is was you call a mockery.

Click to expand...