B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
LoL!
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Poyet
- Thread starter wakeytom
- Start date
LoL!
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
I've said several times that the posting style is very similar. He was wrong about Barnes too.
To go back to the 'moaning about budget', fans were expecting a lot of the squad so Gus & Tanno tried to squash those expectations by pointing out that we had the 14th best budget in the Championship. That wasn't moaning about the budget but tempering high expectations.
Those that want to moan about him will always find negative slants on anything. This then prompts the more fair fans to say, that it wasn't like that at all.
It makes for long debate on Nsc but strangely I don't find these attitudes anywhere else, amongst fans that I know at the Amex or at work.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
Similar to who TB?
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
Gus had a generous budget. He did well with it. So what? Who would expect Burnley to be above QPR in the table at this stage? The league table is not based on financial clout. Oh, and Gus' repeated comments (moans actually) were ungrateful in the extreme.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
I ask you again TB. Similar to who?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Burnley still have parachute payments. The Burnley fan on here on Saturday said their budget was over £15 million whereas ours is £14 million for all staff.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
So, you expected them to be second?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
I never know what to expect. They do have money from parachute payments as do QPR.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
Well, I could have safely predicted most of the top 6 to 10 of the Championship with the exception of Burnley. Parachute payments are significant, but so are other factors, such as attendances.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
TB - are you unable to answer my questions re your post (now extended):
"I've said several times that the posting style is very similar. He was wrong about Barnes too."
I would be very interested to hear who you are 'accusing'.
At the moment, your silence is very telling.
"I've said several times that the posting style is very similar. He was wrong about Barnes too."
I would be very interested to hear who you are 'accusing'.
At the moment, your silence is very telling.
keaton
Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
- Nov 18, 2004
- 9,650
On another thread you claimed the board had been outstanding in their transfer dealings this window, surely that's you already claiming they were right to sell Barnes?
symyjym
Banned
One of the big question marks in Poyet’s reign is that he let Murray (signed by DK) go when he was instrumental in our promotion season, who then went on to our bitter rivals, becoming the Championship top scorer, and playing a massive part in their promotion.
Letting Murray go would have been the same as if Southampton let Lambert go after their promotion. It then took us 18 months to find a replacement.
Letting Murray go would have been the same as if Southampton let Lambert go after their promotion. It then took us 18 months to find a replacement.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
Right to sell Barnes? Yes, IMHO. Right to turn down Sunderland's derisory offers for Bridcutt and Buckley, yes again. BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW AT THIS STAGE.
So, from this, can I assume I am being compared (by you alone) to Mr Burns? Ridiculous. He/she is a totally separate poster! I can't even recall any of his/her posts!
** Actually, you've responded to a question I raised with TB, so ignore that last bit! **