Player ratings vs Palace

G

goldstone

Well-known member

Jul 5, 2003

7,128

• Dec 1, 2012

• #1

How different would it have been if we had 11 for 90 mins? Somehow I think Palace would have been too good for us anyway. Impressive squad.

Kuszczak 8. Some impressive goalkeeping, but again some wayward kicking.
Bruno 7. Has played better.
Greer 5. Thought he was poor today.
Dunk 2. Stupid. He should have let the guy shoot. We'd have possibly been 1-0 down, but at least we'd have had 11 players on the pitch.
Calderon 6. Did OK in the circumstances.
Bridcutt 7. Did what he could in difficult circumstances.
Hammond 6. Didn't impose himself.
Orlandi 7. Did OK playing out of position at left back until went off infured. Ribs? Hope not too bad.
Buckley 7. Few opportunities.
Barnes 5. I figured Gus would play him again, but bad decision.
CMS 5. Crap shooting. Lots of running around.

Subs:
Crofts 7. Did OK.
Dicker 5. Didn't see him do a lot.

 

Skaville

Well-known member

Jun 10, 2004

10,102

Queens Park

• Dec 1, 2012

• #2

7 for Bruno? How badly does this man have to play before our fans start to accept that he is overrated. Great going forward, can't defend for toffee

 

clippedgull

Hotdogs, extra onions

Aug 11, 2003

20,789

Near Ducks, Geese, and Seagulls

• Dec 1, 2012

• #3

Kuszczak 6
Bruno 3
Greer 3
Dunk 2
Calderon 5
Bridcutt 6
Hammond 5
Orlandi 6
Buckley 5
Barnes 5
CMS 5

 

salty seagull

New member

Jun 8, 2009

1,224

Riding alone at the Gates of Oblivion.

• Dec 1, 2012

• #4

Pole 7
Bruno 2
Greer 4
Dunk 0
Calderon 6
Bridcutt 6
Hammond 4
Orlandi 6
Buckley 6
Barnes 6
CMS 4

Crofts 4
Dicker 5

 

EDS

Banned

Nov 11, 2012

2,040

• Dec 1, 2012

• #5

Kuszczak 0
Bruno 0
Greer 0
Dunk 10
Calderon 0
Bridcutt 0
Hammond 0
Orlandi 0
Buckley 0
Barnes 0
CMS 0

 

G

goldstone

Well-known member

Jul 5, 2003

7,128

• Dec 1, 2012

• Thread starter
• #6

Our passing was shocking today.

Overall a disheartening display.

Hope we can up our game massively for Charlton.

 

wehatepalace

Limbs

Apr 27, 2004

7,294

Pease Pottage

• Dec 1, 2012

• #7

Eaglesdestroyseagulls said:

Kuszczak 0
Bruno 0
Greer 0
Dunk 10
Calderon 0
Bridcutt 0
Hammond 0
Orlandi 0
Buckley 0
Barnes 0
CMS 0

Click to expand...

I nearly agree not zeros though 1 & 2. After that shower of shit, they should all hang their heads in shame.

 

matthew

Well-known member

Sep 20, 2009

2,413

Ovingdean, United Kingdom

• Dec 1, 2012

• #8

goldstone said:

How different would it have been if we had 11 for 90 mins? Somehow I think Palace would have been too good for us anyway. Impressive squad.

Kuszczak 8. Some impressive goalkeeping, but again some wayward kicking.
Bruno 7. Has played better.
Greer 5. Thought he was poor today.
Dunk 2. Stupid. He should have let the guy shoot. We'd have possibly been 1-0 down, but at least we'd have had 11 players on the pitch.
Calderon 6. Did OK in the circumstances.
Bridcutt 7. Did what he could in difficult circumstances.
Hammond 6. Didn't impose himself.
Orlandi 7. Did OK playing out of position at left back until went off infured. Ribs? Hope not too bad.
Buckley 7. Few opportunities.
Barnes 5. I figured Gus would play him again, but bad decision.
CMS 5. Crap shooting. Lots of running around.

Subs:
Crofts 7. Did OK.
Dicker 5. Didn't see him do a lot.

Click to expand...

Barnes 5! What a joke he worked his arse off today and if CMS could just score a goal - perfect through ball

 

The Terminator

New member

Aug 7, 2010

1,419

• Dec 1, 2012

• #9

Not going to go through everyone, but personally I thought Barnes, kuszczak and Hammond played okay. Hard to judge anyone considering all the circumstances but I also think that Bruno was pretty poor today.

 

Ninja Elephant

Doctor Elephant

Feb 16, 2009

18,855

• Dec 1, 2012

• #10

Kuszczak 6
Bruno 5
Greer 6
Dunk 0
Calderon 5
Bridcutt 6
Hammond 5
Orlandi 6
Buckley 6
Barnes 5
Mackail-Smith 5

Subs
Crofts 4
Dicker 4

 

Trigger

Well-known member

Jul 4, 2003

40,457

Brighton

• Dec 1, 2012

• #11

Kusczcak 5
Bruno 4
Greer 2
Dunk 1
Calderon 4
Bridcutt 6
Hammond 3
Orlandi 4
Buckley 5
Barnes 1
Mackail-Smith 3

Crofts & Dicker 4

Gus 2

 

bluenitsuj

Listen to me!!!

Feb 26, 2011

4,372

Willingdon

• Dec 1, 2012

• #12

Eaglesdestroyseagulls said:

Kuszczak 0
Bruno 0
Greer 0
Dunk 10
Calderon 0
Bridcutt 0
Hammond 0
Orlandi 0
Buckley 0
Barnes 0
CMS 0

Click to expand...

So they were all better than zaha, especially dunk

 

G

Glenn-Murray

Banned

Jun 24, 2011

1,808

• Dec 1, 2012

• #13

Bruno was terrible. Buckley was useless but rarely saw the ball. Barnes - for all the abuse you gave him - looked very decent whenever he got the ball.

 

BRIGHT ON Q

Well-known member

Jul 5, 2003

9,121

• Dec 1, 2012

• #14

Trigger said:

Kusczcak 5
Bruno 4
Greer 2
Dunk 1
Calderon 4
Bridcutt 6
Hammond 3
Orlandi 4
Buckley 5
Barnes 1
Mackail-Smith 3

Crofts & Dicker 4

Gus 2

Click to expand...

I would go along with that but i think you are being a bit generous with Gus.

 

Barnham Seagull

Yapton Actually

Dec 28, 2005

2,353

Yapton

• Dec 1, 2012

• #15

Kuszczak 6
Bruno 4
Greer 4
Dunk 0
Calderon 5
Bridcutt 6
Hammond 4
Orlandi 5
Buckley 6
Barnes 5.5
Mackail-Smith 4

Subs
Crofts 4
Dicker 4


Players needed to step up to the plate, they did'nt.

Palace were not World beaters but they are positive and at least commit defenders.

 

R

rjbseagull

New member

Apr 27, 2010

197

• Dec 1, 2012

• #16

Kuszczak 7- Didn't do a lot wrong

Bruno 5- Awfu,l worst game for us
Greer 6- Did okay
Dunk N/A- Made a mistake, he'll learn from it
Calderon 6- As with Greer

Hammond 6- Didn't impose himself
Bridcutt 7- Probably my man of the match. Did a good job given the circumstances, played well at left back for a novice as well
Orlandi 6- Was doing okay at LB before injury, hopefully not too serious

Buckley 5- Absolutely anomynous, dissapointing
CMS 5- Had the chance and missed it
Barnes 6.5- Thought he showed a lot of passion. Looked pretty dangerous on the ball as well, certainly justified his recall

Crofts 6- Good in parts when he came on
Dicker 6- Some nice passes, shame he hasn't got a run in the team this year really, looked good whenever he's played

 

Skaville

Well-known member

Jun 10, 2004

10,102

Queens Park

• Dec 1, 2012

• #17

Glenn-Murray said:

Bruno was terrible. Buckley was useless but rarely saw the ball. Barnes - for all the abuse you gave him - looked very decent whenever he got the ball.

Click to expand...

There are plenty of twats on here who would gladly drive him to Selhurst Park and watch him become the next Glenn Murray

 

dingodan

New member

Feb 16, 2011

10,080

• Dec 1, 2012

• #18

Kuszczak 6
Bruno 4
Greer 5
Dunk 3
Calderon 5
Bridcutt 7
Hammond 5
Orlandi 6
Buckley 6
Barnes 6
CMS 5

 

BRIGHT ON Q

Well-known member

Jul 5, 2003

9,121

• Dec 1, 2012

• #19

Jimmy Skaville said:

There are plenty of twats on here who would gladly drive him to Selhurst Park and watch him become the next Glenn Murray

Click to expand...

You honestly believe Barnes could be as good as Murray?

 

E

ees complicated no?

New member

Apr 3, 2011

4,075

Hove, United Kingdom

• Dec 1, 2012

• #20

Kuszczak 6 - I feel sorry for him at times with the crap cover he gets from our defence at times.
Bruno 4 - By far the worst game for us.
Greer 4 - He's getting on my tits he is.
Dunk
Calderon 5 - out of all the defenders he did the 'best'.
Bridcutt 6 - done well out of all our players.
Hammond 4 - Why did we bring him back?
Orlandi 5 - feel sorry for him.
Buckley 6 - Not much he could of done today.
Barnes 3 - I bet he is in the starting 11 next game.
Mackail-Smith 3 - Same as above.