there was no moon landing .... discus

colinz said:

And their answer is. 'What ! and man hasn't got the technology to get there now after 40 years, by having to keep putting the date of the next landings back another 10 years.'

It's inevitable the younger generation will want answers to the most simplest of questions.

Click to expand...

beorhthelm said:

the answer is because theres f*** all there worth it. they push it back 10 years until there is political interest to waste money on the project or it becomes so cheap its within existing budgets. Anyone older than a 15 yo would ask the simpler, why go to the moon? thats not fair on 15yos of course, they probably understand. its more a 7 yo question, or conspiracists who havent accepted that there's nothing on the moon, it was a vanity/political mission and the rocks brought back confirm just how pointless further trips would be.

Click to expand...

readingstockport said:

colinz, I've no idea what uyou are saying but did you start this place or do you read it?

Pakalert Press - Whats REALLY going on in the world

A clustefuck of stupidity all in one site.

Click to expand...

readingstockport said:

colinz, I've no idea what uyou are saying but did you start this place or do you read it?

Pakalert Press - Whats REALLY going on in the world

A cluste**** of stupidity all in one site.

Click to expand...