I don't think that explanation makes any sense actually.
This type of argument always seems to start and end the same way. It starts with people feeling bad about the Calais situation, believing they should be let into the UK, and dismissing any opposition as racist, stupid and unsympathetic...
Yes. All economic migrants. For the reason outlined in my post, which your brain selectively ignored.
If you're moving from a dangerous country to a non-dangerous country, it's refugee. If you then move between ten further safe countries, you're not a refugee anymore. You were safe from...
Someone travelling from France to the UK is NOT an asylum seeker. They found Asylum. In France. France is no less safe than England. They are now, by definition, economic migrants. By the way, they are trying to enter illegally.
Stop twisting these facts to support your own agenda on our...
Evasion tactics:
1. Answer a different question, try to start debate on 'fair share'
2. Plead ignorance, citing individual reasons too complex to go into
3. Create diversion to a 60-page PDF
Bottom line is you can't answer the question because you don't want to admit they're safe in France and...
I think everyone knows about the situation in Syria. What he's trying to tell you is that France, Greece, Austria, Italy, Germany are all safe places for these people to claim asylum. These places should therefore register them as asylum seekers in accordance with international law. Why haven't...
I think he was referring to the "must claim asylum in the first safe country they enter" part of international law for asylum seekers. Since they're supposedly refugees trying to get from France to England, the implication is that they are fleeing from France.
If their home country is not...