Search results

What the hell are you on about? What does a trial linked to Hillsborough have to do with what happened in London today?

I’m sure someone else will become the target of the JFT96 campaign soon enough..

Semantics Madam. A NOT guilty verdict in a criminal court of law. Or do legal decisions only become fact when you agree with them?

Politely I repeat, what is YOUR point?

So your point is?

An error was made. Did that error ALONE cause the death of 96 people?

Please, grow up, so unnecessary. In my opinion the court judgement was correct. Did the Police make errors? In hindsight, yes. Was the ground fit for purpose? Probably not. Were there other contributory factors? Without a shadow of a doubt. Did Duckenfield intentionally cause the deaths of 96...

Oh and here comes Whoopie Goldberg to back up Mother Superior, bore off.

I refer you to post number #102 M'Lady.

Correct, for a group of people to decide............and juries never make errors now do they?

The lies and the cover up were wrong, end, no discussion. Does cause of the tragedy lay exclusively on one man? Certainly not.

'Evidence' is an emotive term, the fact that something is said does not make it fact, that a court accepts 'evidence' does not make it factually correct. If evidence was undoubtedly true then the legal system would not need a jury, or even a judge. But you as Mother Superior obviously know best.

The Hillsborough inquests were conducted at a very different place in time. As much as fans were wrongly blamed in the immediate aftermath and subsequent few years, the inquests were conducted in a time where the battle for hearts and minds had overwhelmingly been won by a lengthy and...

Great post!