Search results

I think you'll find a lot of people might have a paper of choice but read a variety of papers. There's not a paper/ media source in this country that anyone should consume 100% of the time. Or at least back in the days when anyone under the age of 40 actually bought a paper. Also, whataboutery...

"John Lewis resists "Stop Funding Hate" calls to pull newspaper advertising." http://www.cityam.com/253563/john-lewis-resists-stop-funding-hate-calls-pull-newspaper

Now come on, you don't really believe that story do you?

I suspect it's because a) No one has got the foggiest what to do b) That debate is probably far scarier than scapegoating immigrants

Which brings us neatly back to The Daily Mail!

Whilst I do see your point, it was Le Pen being given airtime on Remembrance Sunday that some found particularly distasteful. That decision is made even more bizarre when you consider the interview was pre-recorded. I guess it all hinges on what side of the Le Pen: Fascist or committed patriot...

Because it is not in anyone who really matters interest to build enough for people to live in.

But for that argument to hold water when talking about The Daily Mail specifically, then you'd expect The Sun with a larger readership and a similar worldview to have more complaints rather than approximately half the number. The irony of you railing against a 'blameless' generation whilst...

Isn't this precisely the reason why the looney-left, Guardian reading, lentil munching liberals so despised by The Daily Mail, get their knickers in a twist about high profile figures standing in front of fascist posters or making borderline fascist statements in election campaigns?

I genuinely don't get this statement. Doesn't that make it an effective protest rather than a dangerous precedent? Lego are free to advertise with whoever they please. Pressure groups are free to protest peacefully. It's another essential part of that democracy everyone's so fond of banging on...