Search results

No. We currently propose to fight them here AND there. And they us.

And therein lies the problem. Acts of terror provoke an entirely foreseeable response and the only way to defeat it is to choose to ignore the knee jerk and choose a route they cannot use so readily to glorify themselves. Hard choices. No easy answers (certainly not from me). The worry is that...

I understand what you say and I'm happy that morally I disagree. It's a debate of polar opposites perhaps for another day. But in this instance, and purely on the basis of hard numbers born here and educated here (and entirely unextraditable) you are wrong.

Can't agree with something that frankly seems ill conceived in terms of probable effectiveness and to be largely a face saving exercise. That said "what other choice"? Doing nothing isn't an acceptable option and the nature of our own freedoms precludes us effectively eradicating the very real...