Search results

That would depend on whether or not the "risk" of a repeat was assesed as high enough to warrant that. As I wrote in my original post-we dont know the facts so its hard to speculate on the reasoning behind the decision and therefore whether its reasonable or not to have removed the company.

We dont know the facts. For all we know , someone had an alergic reaction resulting in a very serious life threating incident, and some have gone for the "club wants to make more money" angle Even if that isnt the case then there are other implications When I was running a small business, the...