Search results

So more curry houses and cheap minimarkets and less bookies and Tescos? You're not winning me over

We have done it with Jewish religious courts for years and i'm sure followers of all religions or groups ask their leaders to arbitrate on occasions. They are unfair but I don't see what banning them would achieve. Most are apparently unofficial and therefor if they were banned, they would carry...

Why? If someone is unhappy with what happens in a Sharia Law court, they can still use all legal means open to anyone? (just like they have been able to in relation to jewish religious courts for centuries).

I know. But some people seemed to think that Sharia courts leave people with less legal rights and I don't see how?

Are people who use a Sharia court unable to use legal means later?