Search results

I don't think many people are arguing that the gross misconduct was made up. The issues are anyone who suggests that:they have no reason to believe you; the club could have handled things better; or questions the board in anyway gets called a Gus lover by you

Such self-awareness

So if someone else said they had an impeccable source who they couldn't name or explain in any way what they said but who claimed it was actually all the clubs fault and someone in the club had been spreading anti-lies Gus you would believe them? Even if there posts where erratic and bit...

So you believe any headline you read until proven otherwise?

Was this supposed to be on another thread?

We've already sold our only fit, non-loan striker