Search results

Okay... this really, really isn't difficult stuff: 1. This is a thread, about alleged illegality, in the funding of the leave campaign. 2. You posted, in classic #whataboutism that the government spent more, on their pro-remain leaflets. 3. I asked you what laws that had broken - to point out...

Whilst that would be great for us all, not to mention ****ing hilarious, to watch the all the little Farage disciples explode with rage - that's not going to happen.

This suggestion is going to upset some of our more fervent Brexiteer posters, but I just wonder if, this scandal could offer an escape route for Mrs May. We all know she campaigned to Remain and that whatever she trots out these days, she has no appetite for the path she feels bound to follow...

Waaaaaah. #Whatabout

Remind us which laws that broke, again?

Vote Leave and BeLeave shared an office, shared the services of the same group of volunteers, and (unsubstantiated this bit) even held their information on the same shared server. There was no collusion though. No, sirree...

We all know how accurate opinion polls are.

Well the 'leader' of one side - the lovely Mr Farage - had certainly considered it. You'll recall he made very clear that a marginal result could not be considered definitive, and he would continue to campaign for a second vote.

'wantED'

If some time after that second vote, A) a significant new amount of information was available to voters, and / or B) information came to light proving significant illegal influence in the previous vote, then yes, absolutely we should.

In what possible way is it 'not fair' on you? You'll just vote again as you choose. What are you so scared of?

You’d be well within your rights to campaign for that, yes.

No thanks

With all due respect - bollocks. I get that those of a Leave flavour don’t understand this, or want to acknowledge it, but if people genuinely feel we are making a mistake, they will continue to, and have every right to, fight against it. Pushing for a second vote, is neither undemocratic not...