Search results

Just been doing some research on t'internet about Football Banning Orders and how to appeal against them. Some quite interesting bits of information but too long to describe on here. My suggestion is just to Google it and it will come up with a whole plethora of info. With regard to appealing...

Indefinitely - without fixed or specific time. So really as long or short as required.

Perhaps it was because they were troublesome oiks over there rather than over here. Who knows? The fact that they were caught on film chucking "street furniture" around didn't do them any favours. I suppose one good thing is that they weren't arrested by the French police as it could well have...

They're hardly likely to, are they? The fact that the five in question have "accepted" their punishment will not do much to make the club change its stance. Maybe an act of contrition, a grovelling letter of apology, and chomping on a huge slice of humble pie might make all the difference.

The thing is no-one on NSC is average. Deluded, demented, drunk, opinionated, outspoken but never, ever, average. God forbid! :eek:

They didn't oppose the banning order, which speaks volumes. If they were innocent, as you seem to suggest, why didn't they at least seek legal advice regarding their predicament? A half hour free consultation with a solicitor would no doubt have helped their case if the accusation was unjust or...

If, as you seem to be implying, there were extenuating circumstances regarding the named five people, why did they not oppose the banning order? More to the point why don't you elaborate on proceedings if you feel the need for justification for the accused?