Search results

There's good reason to comp[alin about Clarkson's comments, but the three I have seen all base their complaint around the fact that Meghan is a woman. Why? Why, in today's society, shouldn't Meghan be treated as a person in her own right, and Emily Clarkson and others should call out vile...

Don't you think you're being a bit old fashioned there? For one thing, it's not all that unusual nowadays for a woman (especially in a public profession such as acting) to retain her single name; for another, the modern way is not to differentiate between men and women in matters of etiquette...

To be fair, he didn't want to give up his royal patronage or military associations. He wanted to keep them and use them in America.

It's a recurring circle. If Harry believes it is unnecessary to find out every little detail of what goes on behind the scenes, then why the 6-part series to tell us what went on behind the scenes?

Link here. The same reported in the Daily Telegraph, https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/harry-and-meghans-netflix-doco-called-out-for-multiple-misleading-photos/news-story/0ca034cb324797df67d3494086916bef One of them is a photo shoot of Harry Potter and the Deathly...

[delete - replied to wrong person]